Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy

View Poll Results: Boise St 11-0
1 0 0%
2 1 3.85%
3 0 0%
4 0 0%
5 1 3.85%
6 1 3.85%
7 1 3.85%
8 2 7.69%
9 2 7.69%
10 2 7.69%
over 16 61.54%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-21-2007, 04:13 AM
willie24 willie24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 726
Default Re: free will and god poll

[ QUOTE ]
I experience free will very directly and when I do as Descartes did and not make any assumptions about anything. I disregard everything and start with what can I know? Well the only thing I know is that I have original control over images and thoughts in my mind.

Granted, that could be an illusion. But it could only be an illusion in the way that everything is an illusion, its not provable or unprovable.


[/ QUOTE ]

yes. i think this is what it comes down to. do i have free will? well, yes, relative to the world i percieve.

what about if my perception is wrong or isn't complete? (i percieve logical and physical evidence that this is so, which is a paradox) well, there is no evidence that the world exists apart from "my" perception.

to me, this seems consistent with the idea that consciousness creates the world, rather than vice versa.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-21-2007, 05:05 AM
MaxWeiss MaxWeiss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 1,087
Default Re: free will and god poll

Can I believe in individual free will while also believing in psychohistory and the probability of the masses---that is, no free will over large samples and time periods??
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-21-2007, 05:23 AM
tame_deuces tame_deuces is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,494
Default Re: free will and god poll

[ QUOTE ]
Can I believe in individual free will while also believing in psychohistory and the probability of the masses---that is, no free will over large samples and time periods??

[/ QUOTE ]

Some forms of it yes:

Swarm intelligence
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-21-2007, 05:36 AM
tame_deuces tame_deuces is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,494
Default Re: free will and god poll

Or to state it a little further. The net result of a mass of free agents may be predictable to a very large degree (in some manners of measurement) even if the behavior of the individual agent is far less predictable.

Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-21-2007, 06:00 AM
MaxWeiss MaxWeiss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 1,087
Default Re: free will and god poll

[ QUOTE ]
Or to state it a little further. The net result of a mass of free agents may be predictable to a very large degree (in some manners of measurement) even if the behavior of the individual agent is far less predictable.



[/ QUOTE ]

That's basically exactly what I meant.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-21-2007, 09:34 AM
tarheeljks tarheeljks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: stone that the builder refused
Posts: 4,134
Default Re: free will and god poll

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Or to state it a little further. The net result of a mass of free agents may be predictable to a very large degree (in some manners of measurement) even if the behavior of the individual agent is far less predictable.



[/ QUOTE ]

That's basically exactly what I meant.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm really glad someone mentioned this b/c i had thought about and couldn't decide if i was making any sense or not. any other links deuces?
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-21-2007, 10:18 AM
tame_deuces tame_deuces is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,494
Default Re: free will and god poll

[ QUOTE ]

i'm really glad someone mentioned this b/c i had thought about and couldn't decide if i was making any sense or not. any other links deuces?

[/ QUOTE ]

Classically swarm intelligence has been studied on AIs, engineering and insects since it says the interacting agents have to be fairly simple. Only recently have one began to look at how human intelligence and social factors can be looked at it in a swarm system and how these models can interact.

A combinatory computer model is the 'particle swarm optimization' here is a wiki on it: clicky

There is also a journal called 'Swarm Intelligence' that has 2 issues out and free online content: clicky
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-22-2007, 10:43 PM
Jim14Qc Jim14Qc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 661
Default Re: free will and god poll

I was an atheist for a bit.

Then I tried to think, what hapenned BEFORE the big bang? WTF was there? How come that huge concentration of matter was to explode at T=0?

My brain almost imploded. I can't rationalize that it "all" started at the Big Bang, because then what came before it? If nothing, then how did it come to be? If something, then clearly that something is worth exploring.

Also, if there is a (many?) god(s), then who put them there? How did he/they come to be?

So I guess I'm a bit of an agnostic. The presence or absence of God(s) has absolutely no effect on my life whatsoever. I abide by what I feel are correct morals, which obviously have been influenced by thousands of years of humanity preaching different gods.

Hopefully I never have to find out 'cuz I live forever n all..
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-22-2007, 11:03 PM
willie24 willie24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 726
Default Re: free will and god poll

[ QUOTE ]
I was an atheist for a bit.

Then I tried to think, what hapenned BEFORE the big bang? WTF was there? How come that huge concentration of matter was to explode at T=0?

My brain almost imploded. I can't rationalize that it "all" started at the Big Bang, because then what came before it? If nothing, then how did it come to be? If something, then clearly that something is worth exploring.

Also, if there is a (many?) god(s), then who put them there? How did he/they come to be?

So I guess I'm a bit of an agnostic. The presence or absence of God(s) has absolutely no effect on my life whatsoever. I abide by what I feel are correct morals, which obviously have been influenced by thousands of years of humanity preaching different gods.

Hopefully I never have to find out 'cuz I live forever n all..

[/ QUOTE ]

you just did a pretty good job of pointing out why the existence of the world as we think of it doesn't make sense. which is why im so interested in the idea that consciousness creates the world (and itself).
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-27-2007, 06:11 PM
madnak madnak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn (Red Hook)
Posts: 5,271
Default Re: free will and god poll

I started a whole big post with arguments and such, but then my phone line went out. And stayed that way for a week. As if it's not bad enough to be on dial-up... I'm pretty fried from skimming all the new posts, but I thought I should follow up on this one.

[ QUOTE ]
This is not true.. it seems you're this idea with the Uncertainty Principle. Or, if it is true it isn't widely known and accepted.

[/ QUOTE ]

What don't you think is true and why? I'm being simplistic, granted, because the point is that consciousness has nothing to do with quantum mechanics.

[ QUOTE ]
The problem with your novel metaphor is that someone wrote the novel.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm just talking about the whole as opposed to the parts. I'm not getting into the issue of intelligent design in this thread, I don't see how it's relevant.

[ QUOTE ]
I don't see how I am confusing materialism with determinism, I am aware they are different ideas that are often held by the same people.

[/ QUOTE ]

You said that the atheist worldview is empty and meaningless, and then used materialist assumptions to support your assertion. Regardless, it's semantic. I'd rather stick to free will because the subject of whether atheism is "cold" will just derail things.

[ QUOTE ]
Then you should seriously give consideration (perhaps you have) to an all knowing and all powerful God. I have and for a variety of reasons it doesn't sit with me. I have also done the same with determinism.

[/ QUOTE ]

Absolutely. But I don't get the impression you've familiarized yourself with determinism.

[ QUOTE ]
My definition was a perhaps poor attempt to use what your first definition was minus the part where human's selections do not have an impact on the world. I don't understand that part nor how it is consistent with determinism.

[/ QUOTE ]

That they do have an impact.

[ QUOTE ]
However, my reason for believing in free will is actually not at all arrived at from logic. Logically consistent systems can be created on top of free will or on top of determinism.

One might think, "everything is an illusion, it only seems real" (like the matrix) or, "everything is real." How do you determine which is true? Well you cannot. If you believe everything is an illusion, then anything used to prove otherwise is an illusion in and of itself.

[/ QUOTE ]

What do you mean by "illusion" and "real?"

[ QUOTE ]
This seems to be how determinists deal with the fact that our choices feel free. Free being original and not exclusively coerced factors leading to decisions. No one is trying to deny subconscious choices etc.

[/ QUOTE ]

What do you mean exactly by "coerced?" It seems like you're riding the line of compatibilism. If that's your perspective, then I see no contradictions. If not, then I do.

[ QUOTE ]
To me, I arrive at the conclusion of free will not from intuition, because actually my intuition tells me that the world follows physical laws and we are a part of the world, and we therefore follow physical laws in an albeit more complex manner.

[/ QUOTE ]

That sounds like a logical conclusion, not an intuitive conclusion. But you still aren't explaining why your view of free will and is mutually exclusive with physical laws.

[ QUOTE ]
I experience free will very directly and when I do as Descartes did and not make any assumptions about anything. I disregard everything and start with what can I know? Well the only thing I know is that I have original control over images and thoughts in my mind.

[/ QUOTE ]

What do you mean by "original," and what do you mean by "know?" Descartes couldn't construct a valid argument for the life of him, and even dualists rarely accept the Cartesian premise unaltered. Descartes pretended to remove all assumptions, and consistently failed to do so. I'd love to know how you think you can instantaneously do away with your accumulated biases.

[ QUOTE ]
Granted, that could be an illusion. But it could only be an illusion in the way that everything is an illusion, its not provable or unprovable.

[/ QUOTE ]

It may be, if you define your terms and premises. So far what you're saying is largely nonsensical.

[ QUOTE ]
Some might say well you can prove it, actually. Look at physics. And I say, LOOK AT PHYSICS! The thing about quantum mechanics that leaves the door open for free will is that when there is a probability wave that collapses, its not just that there was a wave breaking when we touch it; it's that when it collapses into a particle we cannot know where that particle is going to collapse.

That is, over an infinite amount of electrons we can tell what the wave pattern will look like when they hit a photographic plate. However, we cannot know where ONE will hit. Not that we don't know how and that some day we will learn, but it is inherent that there is an element of randomness in each particular particle even though on average we can know a great deal about them in general.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure, there appears to be true randomness in each particle. This refutes free will. That is, unless you suggest that free will is actually randomness. Of course, that's just probabilistic determinism, it's a form of compatibilism.

But this isn't what you're saying. You're not saying that your actions are random, you're saying that you control your actions. And while it's possible that you could be doing so at the quantum level, this would result in patterns (corresponding to your choices). Eventually we may be able to determine that quantum events in the brain really are random, and then there will be nowhere for supernatural perspectives to hide. There's the die roll, and there's the causal mechanism, and your actions are one or the other (or both).

And such patterns would only further remove the issue - there would be no indication that causal factors aren't responsible for them. We would simply be unable to identify such factors.

It gets to the point of hair-splitting. If you really want to believe that your physical actions are controlled by magical nonphysical factors that are neither random nor caused, you can throw out empiricism entirely. So even if we do disprove free will using physics, it won't end the issue. You can continue to believe what "feels right" to you - just as people have (often incorrectly) for millenia. This is true of any claim. So we can't know that free will doesn't exist.

What we can know is that there is no basis for believing that free will exists. Or at least, we can empirically establish this. But if your basis isn't logical, so be it. There are a number of serious dilemmas raised by the adoption of beliefs purely on the basis of your own personal perceptions, but I don't want to write out my post again, particularly since nobody may be listening. I may come back to it if the thread revives. But you're basically suggesting the Flying Spaghetti Monster, and this is one of those cases where it's a valid reference. You claim to have some special knowledge that free will exists that is personal, that can't be logically described, and that is unique to you and people like you (or at least, that doesn't exist for me and people like me). And this special knowledge that you claim to have is your only basis for believing in free will.

And you think that's compelling? Well, given that I lack this "special knowledge," I hope you can appreciate my incredulity. Hell, I myself have had spiritual experiences and have felt "communion with God," so at least I can confront believers on that level. I've never experienced free will, so I'll just have to conclude that I'm a zombie and you're a real person (except that a true pzombie would claim to experience free will - I should have copied that other post into notepad...)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.