Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-15-2007, 03:42 PM
NickMPK NickMPK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,626
Default Obama\'s 1996 election


Barack Obama's first run for office was in 1996 for Illinois State Senate. Apparently, the only reason he was elected was because he mounted court challenges against all four of his primary opponents, including the incumbent, and got all of them knocked off the ballot for having questionable petition signatures, so he could run unopposed.

I read this in a magazine today and am surprised it hasn't gotten more press. It seems like something opponents of Obama would be jumping all over.

I don't have a link to the magazine article, but here's similar newspaper article discussing the circumstances of this election.

Does anyone else find this troubling?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-15-2007, 03:45 PM
4 High 4 High is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Team Pretendinitis
Posts: 3,617
Default Re: Obama\'s 1996 election

If i remember correctly all the opponents had messed up big time and had violated the rules that would allow them to be put on the ballot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-16-2007, 06:30 PM
jt082005 jt082005 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Olney, MD
Posts: 104
Default Re: Obama\'s 1996 election

"Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates?" Askia asked. "He talks about honor and democracy, but what honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?"

^^Interesting quotes in the article. When I read your post first thing I thought was typical Chicago like politics
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-16-2007, 07:19 PM
Dan. Dan. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The European Phenom
Posts: 3,836
Default Re: Obama\'s 1996 election

[ QUOTE ]
"Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates?" Askia asked. "He talks about honor and democracy, but what honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?"

[/ QUOTE ]

Because the United States is a nation of laws, not of men. Why should they be allowed to participate if they did not follow the law?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-17-2007, 03:51 AM
AlexM AlexM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Imaginationland
Posts: 5,200
Default Re: Obama\'s 1996 election

LOL @ defenders.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.