The Bourne Ultimatum

[NicksDad1970]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm like 99% sure that when Bourne had a gun to the head of that guy near the end (I'm being vague cause I don't wanna spoil nuffin) he had a Glock then it went away and back and he had a SigSauer.

Then again I could be wrong

[/ QUOTE ]
I noticed that too.

[/ QUOTE ]

I spoke to a gun nut friend and he said he noticed it as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

same here, youre not alone. Im convinced Sig paid money to have their pistols featured, because in one shot it shows the pistol in Bourne's pocket and you can clearly read "SigPro" on it

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't remember where he got the Glock but he certainly had that pointed at the guy first. Then when it came back it was a SigP229. like you I remember seeing the SigPro in there as well.

[DrewDevil]

I think it's pretty obvious that Bourne was banging Nicky like a drum before he got amnesia. She probably took in the ass, too, the little sloot.

[kkcountry]

[ QUOTE ]
She probably took in the ass, too, the little sloot.

[/ QUOTE ]

ldo

[traz]

I just saw the movie tonight, I thought it was very good. My only qualm about it were that the chase scenes were too over the top. I'm not really down with the idea of Bourne taking out half of New York City with his car. I've always loved the Bourne movies because they were intelligent and it was a great game of cat and mouse...not a blow em up series. That being said, all 3 movies are amongst my favorite, and the trilogy as a whole is fantastic.

During the movie, I didn't think the phone call was a flash forward at all, I figured it was just a coy second conversation. But now that I think of it, if the dialogue is identical, the flash forward makes complete sense. I just wish they would have made it a little more obvious for the oblivious folk like me. If it indeed was a flashforward, i like the idea alot.

I also have one question that came to my mind while watching...why was Neil talking to the reporter in the first place?

[DonkeyKongSr]

Finally saw this last night. Great movie, but Shaky Camera Director must die. There were so many times where it was next to impossible to tell exactly what was going on (I think the guy picked up a razor in the bathroom, but I had only about 0.2 seconds to see it). I also don't need the cameraman running up the stairs behind a guy to know that he's running up the stairs fast. This story, reshot with a decent director would have been about 10x better.

See Die Hard 4 for how to jam a bunch of action in without resorting to camera tricks to "increase" the drama.

[Your Mom]

Movie was awesome. Only complaint is that we need more of Nikki in a couple of different ways.

[fuzzwonder]

in all fairness, shakycam was better than the super zoom closeup cam of michael bay in transformers.
yes, i did just compare bourne to transformers.

[Nez477]

I freaking loved this movie

Man, I hadn't had that much fun in the theater since Batman Begins...

Was it the best movie since then, not even close, but I did have tons of fun and was really into every action sequence

And I think the shaky camera complaints are way overrated but that's just me

[Janis N.]

Good movie, though may prove to be ultimately forgettable and fading in with the other two.

I liked the first one a lot, the second one slightly less.