***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

[Neuge]

[ QUOTE ]
It is easily addressed: trade Dunn.

[/ QUOTE ]
That's trading over 30% of your offense when it's at best unproven Bruce can replace it and Hamilton can hold up for an entire season.

[Vyse]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It is easily addressed: trade Dunn.

[/ QUOTE ]
That's trading over 30% of your offense when it's at best unproven Bruce can replace it and Hamilton can hold up for an entire season.

[/ QUOTE ]

You know very little about baseball if you think trading Dunn is bad.

[Neuge]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It is easily addressed: trade Dunn.

[/ QUOTE ]
That's trading over 30% of your offense when it's at best unproven Bruce can replace it and Hamilton can hold up for an entire season.

[/ QUOTE ]

You know very little about baseball if you think trading Dunn is bad.

[/ QUOTE ]
Can you make a point instead of just being dismissive and insulting to someone who might disagree with your non-point?

[Vyse]

The point is so obvious that it doesn't need re-stating. I don't like stating the obvious.

[Neuge]

Okay, maybe I'm as stupid as you say, but would you just make the [censored] point already.

[slothinator]

I believe what Vyse is tired of saying is that Dunn is a terrible defensive OF. While he generates lots of runs with his walks and HR, he costs the Reds runs with his D. Is that about right Vyse?

[Neuge]

[ QUOTE ]
I believe what Vyse is tired of saying is that Dunn is a terrible defensive OF. While he generates lots of runs with his walks and HR, he costs the Reds runs with his D. Is that about right Vyse?

[/ QUOTE ]
Even with those adjustments, and they are huge, he's terrible on defense, he's still the second most valuable player on the Reds and a top 5 overall LF in the majors. Maybe I'm wrong and he's just as terrible at 1B, but I think he'd be more valuable there.

EDIT: He's the 3rd most valuable Red, 2nd if were only talking position players.

[Vyse]

pretty much. sloth nailed it. ty.