Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:19 AM
stinkypete stinkypete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: lost my luckbox
Posts: 5,723
Default i just analyzed my 25/50 results for this year

number of all in hands: 77
total equity after money went in: $68,713.76
total money won: $49,234.87

difference: ($19,478.89)

chances of running this bad or worse: ~0.5%

POKER IS GAY. STARS IS RIGGED. FU ALL.

and yes, i calculated all this [censored] because i hate life.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:20 AM
kyleb kyleb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the death of baseball
Posts: 10,765
Default Re: i just analyzed my 25/50 results for this year

[ QUOTE ]
chances of running this bad or worse: ~0.5%

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah right let's see some math
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:23 AM
stinkypete stinkypete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: lost my luckbox
Posts: 5,723
Default Re: i just analyzed my 25/50 results for this year

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
chances of running this bad or worse: ~0.5%

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah right let's see some math

[/ QUOTE ]





#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>


int
main(int argc, char **argv) {

int numba = 77;

double equity[77] = {
0.5,
0.569,
0.465,
0.112,
0.189,
0.271,
0.622,
0.283,
0.452,
0.614,
0.546,
0.756,
0.912,
0.315,
0.637,
0.475,
0.092,
0.185,
0.525,
0.744,
0.67,
0.319,
0.491,
0.696,
0.634,
0.18,
0.447,
0.679,
0.264,
1,
0.746,
0.25,
0.475,
0.26,
0.809,
0.253,
0.686,
0.25,
0.04,
0.094,
0.819,
0.264,
0.447,
0,
0.882,
0.068,
0.932,
0.259,
0.156,
0.196,
0.824,
0.435,
0.879,
0.496,
0.463,
0.362,
0.248,
0.733,
0.713,
0.47,
0.813,
0.458,
0.526,
0.375,
0.282,
0.897,
0.47,
0.473,
0.131,
0.26,
0.318,
0.504,
0.516,
0.471,
0.731,
0.436,
0.809
};


double potsize[77] = {
1497,
573,
548,
2394,
2222,
1572,
2048,
1697,
1635,
2197,
1923,
2022,
1472,
1854,
966,
1672,
2072,
1797,
1772,
1922,
1147,
2247,
1822,
2381,
2997,
1247,
1897,
2211,
2394,
997,
1061,
2023,
1849,
1667,
1747,
1973,
2547,
2222,
1416,
2035,
2147,
1272,
2819,
3766,
1272,
2747,
1772,
1716,
1272,
2072,
2347,
1897,
2438,
2022,
1322,
2022,
2772,
2460,
2285,
1872,
1994,
2073,
2522,
3636,
1873,
1794,
2073,
2275,
1173,
2203,
1448,
1997,
2022,
2447,
1672,
2016,
1072
};




const int runs = 100000;
double total[runs];

int count = 0;

srand ( time(NULL) );

for(int j = 0; j < runs; j++) {
total[j] = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < numba; i++) {
double rando = double(rand()) / RAND_MAX;
//printf("rando: %f, equity: %f\n",rando,equity[i]);
if(rando <= equity[i]) {
total[j] += potsize[i];
}
}
if (total[j] < 49234.87)
count++;
//printf("You won $%f.\n",total[j]);
}

printf("You ran worse %d times out of %d.\n",count,runs);





}
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:23 AM
rakemeplz rakemeplz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: +ev grimmstar bux vs everyone
Posts: 1,803
Default Re: i just analyzed my 25/50 results for this year

I like people who analyze bad results over a short period and make up some math to quantify it.

Good stuff OP.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:24 AM
stinkypete stinkypete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: lost my luckbox
Posts: 5,723
Default Re: i just analyzed my 25/50 results for this year

[ QUOTE ]
I like people who analyze bad results over a short period and make up some math to quantify it.

Good stuff OP.

[/ QUOTE ]

its not hard to analyze equity after the money went in on all in hands.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:25 AM
billyjex billyjex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,918
Default Re: i just analyzed my 25/50 results for this year *DELETED*

Post deleted by Gildwulf
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:25 AM
stinkypete stinkypete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: lost my luckbox
Posts: 5,723
Default Re: i just analyzed my 25/50 results for this year

and yes, that code is ugly as [censored] but its a 5 minute hack so screw you
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:26 AM
stinkypete stinkypete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: lost my luckbox
Posts: 5,723
Default Re: i just analyzed my 25/50 results for this year

[ QUOTE ]
deleted

[/ QUOTE ]

wanna do it together?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:29 AM
TheTruthSpeaks TheTruthSpeaks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 120
Default Re: i just analyzed my 25/50 results for this year

[ QUOTE ]
STARS IS RIGGED.

[/ QUOTE ]

OBV.

Why hasn't somebody developed some kind of software to analyze every part of a hand equity/ probability wise. The only thing people use is pokertracker which tells you absolutely nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:57 AM
1968 1968 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Big in Japan
Posts: 1,399
Default Re: i just analyzed my 25/50 results for this year

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
kill yourself

[/ QUOTE ]

wanna do it together?

[/ QUOTE ]
lol
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.