Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Business, Finance, and Investing
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-02-2007, 04:44 PM
tolbiny tolbiny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,347
Default Peter Schiff destroys on CNBC

video, euro pacs webpage

My favorite line

"but peter, I don't buy anything with canadian dollars"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-02-2007, 07:13 PM
jumbojacks jumbojacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 853
Default Re: Peter Schiff destroys on CNBC

"but we are at a new record!..."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-02-2007, 07:38 PM
prohornblower prohornblower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: learning the hockey-stop.
Posts: 8,016
Default Re: Peter Schiff destroys on CNBC

The level of the Dow doesn't measure the strength of the USD right?

As I understand the Dow is just an arbitrary number that doesn't relate to other economies.

Like if the Fed keeps cutting the rate to encourage borrowing and spending and building, etc. the Dow will reflect a "growth", but the strength of that growth compared to other World economies isn't quantified in some cute little number like 14,000.

I'm a noob at this stuff so tell me if I'm wrong or right.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-02-2007, 08:47 PM
DcifrThs DcifrThs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Spewin them chips
Posts: 10,115
Default Re: Peter Schiff destroys on CNBC

[ QUOTE ]
The level of the Dow doesn't measure the strength of the USD right?

As I understand the Dow is just an arbitrary number that doesn't relate to other economies.

Like if the Fed keeps cutting the rate to encourage borrowing and spending and building, etc. the Dow will reflect a "growth", but the strength of that growth compared to other World economies isn't quantified in some cute little number like 14,000.

I'm a noob at this stuff so tell me if I'm wrong or right.

[/ QUOTE ]

on average, the strength of the dollar is probably uncorrelated to changes in the dow (or the level of the dow). there are a ton of factors that could explain positive and negative correlations but overall i'd think it would be a wash. if not, it would be a very small positive or negative overall correlation.

you could test this by looking at a chart of the level of the trade weighted dollar index vs. the level of the dow, the changes in the trade weighted dollar index vs. level of the dow, and the changes in the trade weighted dollar index vs. changes in the dow back as far as you can get data.

Barron
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-03-2007, 12:27 AM
pig4bill pig4bill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,658
Default Re: Peter Schiff destroys on CNBC

The Dow is just an index of 30 industrial stocks. It's not arbitrary, there's a complex formula used to calculate it. There are multinationals like GE that are affected by currency exchange rates, but it's mostly US dollar denominated.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-03-2007, 02:29 AM
kimchi kimchi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FU minbet
Posts: 1,246
Default Re: Peter Schiff destroys on CNBC

[ QUOTE ]


"but peter, I don't buy anything with canadian dollars"

"but we are at a new record!..."

[/ QUOTE ]

These are pretty naive points made by the presenter & Larry.

It's not true that Americans don't buy anything with Canadian dollars, or any other currency. Many goods are imported into the US, and these goods are generally priced in that country's currency. A declining $ is a significant source of inflation for Americans.

The Zimbabwe Industrial index has climbed from 50000000 to 150000000 since early summer this year; a rise of 200% to reach record highs. So if Larry is so excited about high stock index valuations, then maybe he should plough into The ZSE.

Peter Schiff has been saying the same things on CNBC for years, and gets the same responses from the presenters and opponents. Nobody seems to listen to the fact that the people for whom he manages money have really cleaned up the past 5 or 8 years.

If people are happy to be invested in something that's increasing in value a little rather than something that's increasing in value significantly, then that's their choice.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.