Which Is Worse

[David Sklansky]

Putting on and charging admission for those over 21 to watch dogfights or offering live homosexual sex shows between consenting adults?

[Silent A]

Former. How is this even a question worth asking?

[Arp220]

[ QUOTE ]
Former. How is this even a question worth asking?

[/ QUOTE ]

[chezlaw]

[ QUOTE ]
Putting on and charging admission for those over 21 to watch dogfights or offering live homosexual sex shows between consenting adults?

[/ QUOTE ]
Bizarre question. Is this a question about silly laws/judgements?

chez

[Nielsio]

Worse what?

[Phil153]

Without offering reasons, I'm going to go with the latter.

[Farfenugen]

I'm going to go with the homogaysex because this seems like such an obvious/dumb question that I think Sklansky is going to pull some crazy genius logic out of his bag of tricks and show that the non-obvious answer is the correct one.

EDIT: Oh wait. After reading the question again I caught the "live" part which I assume implies that this act will be viewable by anyone. I'm going to go with the homogaysex then because any kind of sex act can really mess with kids heads while the only damage in the former case is animal cruelty.

David: Can you elaborate on what "live" means in the context of your question?

[yukoncpa]

Charging for dogfights seems clearly worse. Poor dogs.

[Carded]

The latter.

Dogfighting shmog fighting. Animals fighting animals survival of the fittest at work, GOOD SHOW! I think the bussiness should open up a bit, I would like to see tiger, bears, lions, wolves, snakes... and other animals get into the mix.

[chezlaw]

[ QUOTE ]
Animals fighting animals survival of the fittest at work

[/ QUOTE ]
homosexuality is a far more subtle display of survival of the fittest.

chez