Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2007, 05:51 PM
Jurrr Jurrr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,715
Default NL200: 33 bottom set river action deep KT3J9 board

Line check.

NL200 6-handed. Hero is SB with $722 and 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
CO is 18/7.28/1.43 with $365. I don't think he's that good.

2 folds, CO raises to $7, BTN folds, Hero calls $6, BB folds.

Flop 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($15)

Hero checks, CO bets $10, Hero raises to $46, CO calls.

Turn J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($108)

Hero bets $108, CO calls $108.

River 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($324)

Hero shoves (villain has $204 behind).


Looks good? Slow down somewhere?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-02-2007, 05:55 PM
mooney mooney is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 279
Default Re: NL200: 33 bottom set river action deep KT3J9 board

Tough spot. I'd need more than PT stats to make a good decision. I think i check-call this river though to induce bluffs from missed FD's. Not many hands you beat are going to call your shove.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2007, 05:57 PM
Jurrr Jurrr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,715
Default Re: NL200: 33 bottom set river action deep KT3J9 board

I'm actually thinking he's bad enough to possibly call with AK figuring me for a busted FD.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2007, 06:01 PM
Butcho22 Butcho22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Thinking about Tiger, ldo
Posts: 2,119
Default Re: NL200: 33 bottom set river action deep KT3J9 board

[ QUOTE ]
I'm actually thinking he's bad enough to possibly call with AK figuring me for a busted FD.

[/ QUOTE ]

That would be like, "I thought you had KK" bad
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-02-2007, 06:03 PM
Jurrr Jurrr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,715
Default Re: NL200: 33 bottom set river action deep KT3J9 board

[ QUOTE ]
That would be like, "I thought you had KK" bad

[/ QUOTE ]Yes, only in the other direction.

Well maybe there are some two pair that call me (not sure which ones he'd raise from CO but there should be some).

Edit - I think/hope AA calls me as well (fingers crossed).


Anyway, nobody suggests not betting turn or c/f river?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-02-2007, 06:49 PM
bilbo-san bilbo-san is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In ur game, pickin off ur bluffz
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: NL200: 33 bottom set river action deep KT3J9 board

c/c river is pretty sick. I think he checks a [censored] ton of hands if you check here. I doubt a busted draw is a big part of his range, and just about every made hand he has is checking behind, unless he has a T.

I like it as played.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-02-2007, 05:59 PM
Aschweinsteiger Aschweinsteiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 318
Default Re: NL200: 33 bottom set river action deep KT3J9 board

i play the hand the exact same way. this might be a leak but after i bet the turn(i would bet a little more) im going to shove almost any river.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-02-2007, 05:57 PM
Butcho22 Butcho22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Thinking about Tiger, ldo
Posts: 2,119
Default Re: NL200: 33 bottom set river action deep KT3J9 board

May I ask why you didn't just c/c the river instead of shoving?

EDIT: I see someone beat me to it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.