Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-30-2006, 04:55 PM
By-Tor By-Tor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SAYING what others are thinking
Posts: 5,120
Default PGA: How are the starting times determined...

How are the starting times determined for the first two rounds?

- Curious
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-30-2006, 05:38 PM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: www.twoplustwo.com
Posts: 2,733
Default Re: PGA: How are the starting times determined...

My understanding is some smart guy tries to find a balance of marquis names in both cohorts and spread throughout so that afternoon tee times on both thursday and friday will have groups that will be good for television. A couple may be determined by tradition. A couple by whimsy.

There are two balancing priorites. One is being fair to the field. As the Thurs PM and Fri AM (modulo the forecast) is generally thought of as desireable by the player --so the same guy always getting that would seem unfair. And two, try and make it good for TV, both with interesting pairings, but also, with players spread out.

The golf mags every several years or so seem to have an article on this...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-30-2006, 06:00 PM
tuq tuq is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: god for Mike Haven
Posts: 13,313
Default Re: PGA: How are the starting times determined...

shemp,

I think you mostly nailed it, but it's worth noting that the big-name players always go off in the middle of each pack. You'll never see a top-50 or maybe even top-100 player in the first or last couple groups. This almost has to be for reasons related to the telecast, because if pros had their pick they would probably choose to go off as early as possible.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-30-2006, 06:14 PM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: www.twoplustwo.com
Posts: 2,733
Default Re: PGA: How are the starting times determined...

"You'll never see a top-50 or maybe even top-100 player in the first or last couple groups."

Tiger is in the second to last group on Friday at the first round of the Deutsche Bank. I think it would depend on when the telecast intersects with the starting times -- which might be different depending on time of year and time zone. And there is too, a responsibility to the field as well as the broadcaster. So I wouldn't say "never."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-30-2006, 06:48 PM
tuq tuq is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: god for Mike Haven
Posts: 13,313
Default Re: PGA: How are the starting times determined...

shemp,

FU. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Seriously, I've seen a ton of pairing sheets in my time - particularly when they come to Phoenix - and I've never seen a tournament (or at least a non-major) in which a big name is remotely near the fringes of the tee times. So, news to me.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-30-2006, 07:32 PM
JTrout JTrout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,873
Default Re: PGA: How are the starting times determined...

In a full-field event, the best go off in the middle, the guys you've kind of heard of go off first, and the rif-raf bring in the flags.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-30-2006, 07:37 PM
HDPM HDPM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,585
Default Re: PGA: How are the starting times determined...

I don't know all the details, but winners are put together and get tee times more in the middle of the Am or PM times usually I think. You always have one AM and one PM time the first two days. 3 non winners are going to get the 7:00 tee time. I don't know exactly how the tour does the pairings aside from winners/non winners, i.e. how far the status goes. So you see when Annika or Michelle play, they get paired with non winners, not Tiger. The majors are different naturally, see the PGA pairing w/ the year's major winners, the USGA's "jerk" pairing, the masters putting the defending champ w/ amateur champ. I think the tour randomizes more, and I don't know how the status changes from a non winner who has made a lot of money vs. a guy with a very low exemption category, say Padraig Harrington before he won vs. Lance Ten Broeck on a made some cuts a while ago and only 149 guys signed up this week entry.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.