Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-18-2007, 05:17 AM
Scotty_12 Scotty_12 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stoxpoker Coach
Posts: 1,282
Default Re: The Fine Line Between FPS and Being a Robot

Eagles makes a good point that you can put nits on like 5 hands in levels 1 and 2 alot of the time ... Having a wider pf range is fine b/c half the time you are cbetting whiffed AK or QQ/JJ on K/Q high boards and taking it down vs the check/folding donks anyways. I think good postflop play + a large pt database are two huge assets if you are gong to start experimenting though

Prop bets on ROI for 'laggy' sng stats over 500-1k sngs anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18-2007, 05:44 AM
lacky lacky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boise
Posts: 3,021
Default Re: The Fine Line Between FPS and Being a Robot

[ QUOTE ]
One big leak I think a lot of sng regs have is they play too ABC and it becomes incredibly easy to read their hands

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, when i talk about stealing small pots from nits, this is exactly it. your typical sng grinder raises mid position in level one. you call on the button (with a loose image, youve played them enough they know you call wide). flop comes 456 or 889, etc, pot is already yours, cause that flop is in no way in their range, and it's in yours. they check fold flop, or they weak cont bet, you call, they c/f turn. works every time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-18-2007, 05:54 PM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 13,960
Default Re: The Fine Line Between FPS and Being a Robot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
One big leak I think a lot of sng regs have is they play too ABC and it becomes incredibly easy to read their hands

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, when i talk about stealing small pots from nits, this is exactly it. your typical sng grinder raises mid position in level one. you call on the button (with a loose image, youve played them enough they know you call wide). flop comes 456 or 889, etc, pot is already yours, cause that flop is in no way in their range, and it's in yours. they check fold flop, or they weak cont bet, you call, they c/f turn. works every time.

[/ QUOTE ]


AA-JJ doesn't need a flop of high cards to continue. If they really are that nitty they will have hit that flop a decent % of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-22-2007, 03:00 AM
drzen drzen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Donkeytown
Posts: 2,704
Default Re: The Fine Line Between FPS and Being a Robot

I don't mind being easily read at the low limits. No one is trying to read me anyway.

Why not just limp A5s from the CO? I don't see why I want to make the pot bigger when I don't have much hand. I don't flop a flush too often, and I don't want to pay a lot to draw to one. I don't care about stealing the blinds in the first couple of levels. They just don't add much to my equity when I win them. If one of the blinds makes some kind of gayraise, I still have position. Most donks on the button won't position-raise an open limp.

Don't get me wrong. I hate limping when the blinds are higher. But I merrily limp small pairs early if I'm fairly sure that I won't get heavily raised behind.

Is the benefit of having the lead enough to make it worth raising? Will I take away enough pots on the flop to make up for losing bigger pots when I lose?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.