Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-14-2007, 10:50 AM
pegboy pegboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 432
Default Re: There must be a standard line here

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

I think approx 1/2 the hands in his range have you beat


[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree because there are only four aces in the deck and we can see two of them.

Guy.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're right, I'm wrong, I like #2 even more now.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-14-2007, 10:54 AM
danzasmack danzasmack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DYNAMO HARSHBART
Posts: 7,370
Default Re: There must be a standard line here

One thing I'll do if like the board is

A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] - he bets, I call

I'll raise like the 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] or 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] turn
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-14-2007, 11:15 AM
sebastien sebastien is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 469
Default Re: There must be a standard line here

why???
i really think he doesn t fold is AX
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-14-2007, 11:16 AM
danzasmack danzasmack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DYNAMO HARSHBART
Posts: 7,370
Default Re: There must be a standard line here

because i can't get 3-bet
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-14-2007, 12:25 PM
Guy McSucker Guy McSucker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Waiting for sethypooh to act
Posts: 3,744
Default Re: There must be a standard line here

[ QUOTE ]
One thing I'll do if like the board is

A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] - he bets, I call

I'll raise like the 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] or 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] turn

[/ QUOTE ]

That's pretty interesting.

I was also wondering about raising when a broadway card hits the turn. You stand a decent chance of getting paid off, if he's hit that card; you get to protect your hand a bit versus gutshot draws that will most likely check-fold the river UI anyway; and again you're pretty unlikely to be threebet by anything you beat or split with. Anyone like?

Guy.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-14-2007, 12:37 PM
jstill jstill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: downtown portsmouth
Posts: 3,641
Default Re: There must be a standard line here

i like raising the board pairing bdfd cards, u get alot of light calldowns on that card (atleast from me [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ), but after u raise this turn do u have a clear vb on the river?

And if u raise/fold to a 3bet on a broadway card and the board is A96K and he finds a good 3bet with TPTK (easier to do if u are habitually raising the turn here with TPNK), u miss out on 3 outs for the win and 6 for the chop, getting like 10:1 now. and again if u raise this turn, whats the correct river action? His range is much stronger after he calls ur raise on a K Q or J turn.

i think u just get urself in trouble and end up with ambiguous decisions on the river or when faced with a 3bet (particularly against unknowns). The major plus side tho is metagame, if he cant respect a turn raise since it could be any draw or any TP u get paid off more later. Not sure its always worth gaining that to give up some by taking a slightly less than optimal line thats a bit too aggressive (raise turn on a 9 6 or broadway, and bet a blank river), since we ll probably be semi-bluffing enough already in many other spots.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-14-2007, 01:38 PM
Apanage Apanage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 958
Default Re: There must be a standard line here

If you get 3-bet on turn by a decent LAG/TAG on a non-pair board your hand is dead anyways (I know some people donīt believe that. But that is a fact).So the board pairing donīt give us any reason to raise if we didnīt find it suitable on a non-paired board.
The only thing you accomplish with a turn raise on a paired board is that you may scare TT-KK to fold since they now realize that there are more possible hands that has the potential to beat their PP.
Most of the value from playing WA/WB in the first place is to avoid folding worse hands which makes this line some kind of contraproductive.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-14-2007, 01:47 PM
Nate tha\\\' Great Nate tha\\\' Great is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: blogging
Posts: 8,480
Default Re: There must be a standard line here

One thing I'll say is that raising the turn doesn't make any sense unless you can value bet the river.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-14-2007, 01:49 PM
Apanage Apanage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 958
Default Re: There must be a standard line here

I hate WA/WB lines but I think it is by far the best in this case when we have position.
I think raising turn and check behind is second best. But that depends on the turn card.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-14-2007, 01:54 PM
danzasmack danzasmack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DYNAMO HARSHBART
Posts: 7,370
Default Re: There must be a standard line here

[ QUOTE ]
i like raising the board pairing bdfd cards, u get alot of light calldowns on that card (atleast from me [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ), but after u raise this turn do u have a clear vb on the river?

[/ QUOTE ]

1st part answers 2nd part.

This play also substantiates future turn raises and wins $ when you do raise the turn and AK is like "WTF LOL" later on. because they "learned"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.