get rid of the blinds?

[randomly]

so i was thinking, even when great players 'snieds' for eg post their stats, every single time they're losing in the blinds, both big and small.....

so why not just get rid of the blinds and make it +ev?!


the fish won't notice the difference anyway, ad it'll be easier because action can just be tighter for +evvs

[starchyy]

idiot

[Daliman]

If ever a "BASTARD" option was needed...

[randomly]

if someone could give a good reason why this isn't a great idea, i'm all ears

[gregorio]

Maybe we could get rid of rake, too. I always lose money on that.

[bottomset]

[ QUOTE ]
if someone could give a good reason why this isn't a great idea, i'm all ears

[/ QUOTE ]

without their being forced action to try and win, there isn't any reason to play hands besides the nuts

[randomly]

right, i understand that, but we wouldn't be getting rid of the FISH who are going to play all sorts of cards, which would be +ev for us 2+2+2ers

can you deny it?

[pete fabrizio]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if someone could give a good reason why this isn't a great idea, i'm all ears

[/ QUOTE ]

without their being forced action to try and win, there isn't any reason to play hands besides the nuts

[/ QUOTE ]

playing no-blind poker can be pretty interesting.

[Lurker.]

i voted for "no, i like losing money" because somehow, it was the less retarded of the two.

[ebepse]

i kinda like this gimmick