Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-24-2007, 05:28 PM
FrogMouth FrogMouth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 374
Default $100/nl TT vs LAG

Villian is 45/25/3.5

I know I played it passivly. I couldn't see him calling a flop bet without an Ace and I planned to call down to catch a bluff but with the king on the river I was sure I was loosing.

I don't like it. Comments?

Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 9 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $119.85
BB: $100.00
UTG: $141.65
UTG+1: $130.90
Hero (MP1): $111.50
MP2: $114.95
MP3: $34.80
CO: $82.40
BTN: $121.20

Preflop: Hero is dealt T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (9 Players)
UTG folds, <font color="red">UTG+1 raises to $3.00</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $12.00</font>, 6 folds, UTG+1 calls $9.00

Flop: ($25.50) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($25.50) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">UTG+1 bets $7.00</font>, Hero calls $7.00

River: ($39.50) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">UTG+1 bets $24.00</font>, Hero folds
Uncalled bet of $24.00 returned to UTG+1

Pot Size: $39.50 ($1.95 Rake)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2007, 08:32 AM
shark6 shark6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MPLS
Posts: 933
Default Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG

Bump. I think think hero should be betting $20 on the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2007, 08:41 AM
warrantofice warrantofice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 463
Default Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG

I would say you gotta make you decision on the flop. Either you continuation bet, or your check folding. Normally in this spot i would check fold the 10's. He raise from UTG+1 so i would put his hand range as AK-AJ + AA-JJ perhaps the odd KQs or QJs. And when he calls the large reraise he probably isn't doing that with air.
You gotta know when you uncle sometimes, and i think here you needed to say it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2007, 08:59 AM
shark6 shark6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MPLS
Posts: 933
Default Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG

[ QUOTE ]
i would put his hand range as AK-AJ + AA-JJ perhaps the odd KQs or QJs.

[/ QUOTE ]

He PFR's 25% of the time. I think it's safe to say his range is quite a bit wider than that.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2007, 09:27 AM
warrantofice warrantofice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 463
Default Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG

I didn't read that part. So yah, i guess your right a bit. Although, unless he's just spewing chips, than i wouldn't give him to much of a wider range, it is UTG i'm sure most of his raising has come from middle/late position. Perhaps put him on any two paint cards.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-25-2007, 10:42 AM
ship_it_trebek ship_it_trebek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ill take eZ stax for 100
Posts: 848
Default Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG

Please bet that flop.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-25-2007, 11:11 AM
QTip QTip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 6,131
Default Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG

[ QUOTE ]
I know I played it passivly. I couldn't see him calling a flop bet without an Ace and I planned to call down to catch a bluff but with the king on the river I was sure I was loosing.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm just thinking out loud here....

I think you need to consider this before you raise PF. If you're not going to take the initiative in the hand when an over lands (spec. a K or A), then I think you should just be calling PF.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-25-2007, 03:38 PM
FrogMouth FrogMouth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 374
Default Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG

I'm not afraid of the Ace, I just see no value in betting this flop. Basically by betting I'm hoping he has 2 clubs or that he can't fold 88. Villian is agressive and will bet and by check calling I pick off his bluffs. The combo of A&amp;K on the river convince me I'm loosing so I fold.

Why should I bet the flop?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-25-2007, 10:21 PM
mce86 mce86 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,140
Default Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG

Why would you think you were losing with the King out? Good chance you were behind, but I wouldnt give much credit with those stats. Also, if you thought you were behind, why bet river? Of course, if he dropped a hand like JJ or QQ (doubt it), the it was a good bet.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-25-2007, 10:39 PM
Albert Moulton Albert Moulton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Live Full Ring NLHE
Posts: 2,377
Default Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG

This is a great flop for a continuation bet.

Stick it to him for at aleast $20. If he c/r's or calls/leads the turn, then fold.

But if you cb $20 then you win this pretty often unless he has a big draw or TPGK-or better. Most of the time he'll have an under pair or air and probably fold to a stiff cb.

I wouldn't go around reraising in position with TT unless you can cb on a flop like this.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.