#1
|
|||
|
|||
$100/nl TT vs LAG
Villian is 45/25/3.5
I know I played it passivly. I couldn't see him calling a flop bet without an Ace and I planned to call down to catch a bluff but with the king on the river I was sure I was loosing. I don't like it. Comments? Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 9 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter) SB: $119.85 BB: $100.00 UTG: $141.65 UTG+1: $130.90 Hero (MP1): $111.50 MP2: $114.95 MP3: $34.80 CO: $82.40 BTN: $121.20 Preflop: Hero is dealt T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (9 Players) UTG folds, <font color="red">UTG+1 raises to $3.00</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $12.00</font>, 6 folds, UTG+1 calls $9.00 Flop: ($25.50) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) UTG+1 checks, Hero checks Turn: ($25.50) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">UTG+1 bets $7.00</font>, Hero calls $7.00 River: ($39.50) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">UTG+1 bets $24.00</font>, Hero folds Uncalled bet of $24.00 returned to UTG+1 Pot Size: $39.50 ($1.95 Rake) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG
Bump. I think think hero should be betting $20 on the flop.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG
I would say you gotta make you decision on the flop. Either you continuation bet, or your check folding. Normally in this spot i would check fold the 10's. He raise from UTG+1 so i would put his hand range as AK-AJ + AA-JJ perhaps the odd KQs or QJs. And when he calls the large reraise he probably isn't doing that with air.
You gotta know when you uncle sometimes, and i think here you needed to say it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG
[ QUOTE ]
i would put his hand range as AK-AJ + AA-JJ perhaps the odd KQs or QJs. [/ QUOTE ] He PFR's 25% of the time. I think it's safe to say his range is quite a bit wider than that. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG
I didn't read that part. So yah, i guess your right a bit. Although, unless he's just spewing chips, than i wouldn't give him to much of a wider range, it is UTG i'm sure most of his raising has come from middle/late position. Perhaps put him on any two paint cards.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG
Please bet that flop.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG
[ QUOTE ]
I know I played it passivly. I couldn't see him calling a flop bet without an Ace and I planned to call down to catch a bluff but with the king on the river I was sure I was loosing. [/ QUOTE ] I'm just thinking out loud here.... I think you need to consider this before you raise PF. If you're not going to take the initiative in the hand when an over lands (spec. a K or A), then I think you should just be calling PF. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG
I'm not afraid of the Ace, I just see no value in betting this flop. Basically by betting I'm hoping he has 2 clubs or that he can't fold 88. Villian is agressive and will bet and by check calling I pick off his bluffs. The combo of A&K on the river convince me I'm loosing so I fold.
Why should I bet the flop? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG
Why would you think you were losing with the King out? Good chance you were behind, but I wouldnt give much credit with those stats. Also, if you thought you were behind, why bet river? Of course, if he dropped a hand like JJ or QQ (doubt it), the it was a good bet.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100/nl TT vs LAG
This is a great flop for a continuation bet.
Stick it to him for at aleast $20. If he c/r's or calls/leads the turn, then fold. But if you cb $20 then you win this pretty often unless he has a big draw or TPGK-or better. Most of the time he'll have an under pair or air and probably fold to a stiff cb. I wouldn't go around reraising in position with TT unless you can cb on a flop like this. |
|
|