Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-29-2007, 06:03 PM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: 200 NL - Some Hands

#1: easy shove against loose half-stack.
#2: call.
#3: Usually bet turn, but your line is fine too.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-29-2007, 06:35 PM
RapidLearner RapidLearner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 43
Default Re: 200 NL - Some Hands

Hand 1: I'd probably jam this given villain's stats and the drawy board. You'll see 65, 55, flush draw here quite a bit.

Hand 2: Call is good. 5.7:1 odds.

Hand 3: Reasonable. Are you planning on folding to large raises? Also, consider checking if you feel villain will bluff his busted draws.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-29-2007, 06:52 PM
pterodactyl_ pterodactyl_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Owning Foxwoods
Posts: 842
Default Re: 200 NL - Some Hands

If you think ive been floating you a lot then i like c/r on the turn. However, if you think I've been playing starightforward then betting again will probably get more value out of AQ/AJ. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Did I have AQ here?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-29-2007, 06:56 PM
mab812 mab812 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 117
Default Re: 200 NL - Some Hands

do you think a check on the river with an offsuit 2 would induce a bluff? or a bet by a weaker ace? and even if you c/raise...a bluff obviously won't call, and a weaker ace might not as well.

As played, you can get a weak ace A10/aj/aQ to make a crying call?

correct? i dont know if you'd get more value by checkraising the river there.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-29-2007, 06:59 PM
ASPoker8 ASPoker8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Titletown (Boston, UF)
Posts: 13,738
Default Re: 200 NL - Some Hands

[ QUOTE ]
If you think ive been floating you a lot then i like c/r on the turn. However, if you think I've been playing starightforward then betting again will probably get more value out of AQ/AJ. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Did I have AQ here?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes and I was so pissed because if the river is a blankish type card I'm going to c/r river and it probably works
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:01 PM
ASPoker8 ASPoker8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Titletown (Boston, UF)
Posts: 13,738
Default Re: 200 NL - Some Hands

[ QUOTE ]
do you think a check on the river with an offsuit 2 would induce a bluff? or a bet by a weaker ace? and even if you c/raise...a bluff obviously won't call, and a weaker ace might not as well.

As played, you can get a weak ace A10/aj/aQ to make a crying call?

correct? i dont know if you'd get more value by checkraising the river there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good players are valuebetting AQ/AJ/AT 100% on a blank (2o) river. They should also be betting any random floats or unimproved weak type hands when I check to them after raising pf, cbetting A-hi flop, and shutting down.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:14 PM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: 200 NL - Some Hands

1. shove
2. call
3. I would probably either fire 3 streets or go for the c/r on the river also. I assume you missed one on the turn right?

edit: ok, I see that you did miss a c/r. Thats fine. Are we not c/r the river because we think AJ is a big part of his range or because he isn't going to bet hands worse than AQ because you're calling with Ax and chopping a lot of the time?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:19 PM
ASPoker8 ASPoker8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Titletown (Boston, UF)
Posts: 13,738
Default Re: 200 NL - Some Hands

[ QUOTE ]
1. shove
2. call
3. I would probably either fire 3 streets or go for the c/r on the river also. I assume you missed one on the turn right?

edit: ok, I see that you did miss a c/r. Thats fine. Are we not c/r the river because we think AJ is a big part of his range or because he isn't going to bet hands worse than AQ because you're calling with Ax and chopping a lot of the time?

[/ QUOTE ]

The J is a bad rivercard to c/r because the c/r becomes ineffective since it won't work against hands like AQ anymore [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:26 PM
iponnet iponnet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 552
Default Re: 200 NL - Some Hands

1.shove
2.call is good, call reasonable river bet
3.played well
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.