donks are donking pt.1 - Page 2

Unknown Soldier · #11 10-23-2007, 01:15 PM

ok well i was like "lol, wtf?" and called which i usually do when im confused. Then he did this:

River: 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($49, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">SB is all-in $89.55</font>, US??

then i felt dumb as i figured i should either be snapping this or folding turn? thoughts?

ike, i doubt many As in his range.

FireCorp · #12 10-23-2007, 01:17 PM

without any read I would fold, probably he does not have the 5, but if he has it, will be pretty expensive

pineapple888 · #13 10-23-2007, 01:18 PM

[ QUOTE ]
ok well i was like "lol, wtf?" and called which i usually do when im confused. Then he did this:

River: 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($49, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">SB is all-in $89.55</font>, US??

then i felt dumb as i figured i should either be snapping this or folding turn? thoughts?

[/ QUOTE ]

Eh, I doubt you are chopping often enough now. w/e on turn, obviously reads would kinda help here.

Unknown Soldier · #14 10-23-2007, 01:19 PM

so you dont think calling turn -> calling here?

pineapple888 · #15 10-23-2007, 01:25 PM

[ QUOTE ]
so you dont think calling turn -> calling here?

[/ QUOTE ]

Obv not, can't really see why you'd think that way. But working backwards if you are pretty sure he's gonna shove river then don't call the turn.

Unknown Soldier · #16 10-23-2007, 01:26 PM

just seemes q. likely from his bet size that's all. but idk never seen this before w/o reads [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

pineapple888 · #17 10-23-2007, 01:27 PM

[ QUOTE ]
just seemes q. likely from his bet size that's all. but idk never seen this before w/o reads [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, it's an annoying spot. But turn is one of those spots where you say "can't raise... can't fold readless... so I call" then go from there.

ikestoys · #18 10-23-2007, 01:32 PM

[ QUOTE ]

ike, i doubt many As in his range.

[/ QUOTE ]

wait, so you have reads?!?!? Because otherwise this seems a little results orientated.

Suigin406 · #19 10-23-2007, 01:52 PM

any more comments on what u alluded to earlier US?? if we call turn thinking our hand was good/chop, can/should be fold this now??

Unknown Soldier · #20 10-23-2007, 02:19 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

ike, i doubt many As in his range.

[/ QUOTE ]

wait, so you have reads?!?!? Because otherwise this seems a little results orientated.

[/ QUOTE ]

no reads. it makes more sense that his range is polarized, big bets usually don't mean marginal hands. So I'm going off that.

I actually folded the river, so i don't know what he had if you're convinced im being results orientated.