|
|
#41
11-23-2007, 04:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Angels Sign Torii Hunter - 5 years $80M
[ QUOTE ]
Who would you rather have Tori Hunter, at 32 , for 5 years at 16M per or Vernon Wells, turns 29 in a few weeks, for 6 more years at 18M per [/ QUOTE ] Wells. 
|
|
#42
11-23-2007, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Angels Sign Torii Hunter - 5 years $80M
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Who would you rather have Tori Hunter, at 32 , for 5 years at 16M per or Vernon Wells, turns 29 in a few weeks, for 6 more years at 18M per [/ QUOTE ] Wells. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#43
11-23-2007, 04:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Angels Sign Torii Hunter - 5 years $80M
[ QUOTE ]
I feel like just by avoiding retarded contracts like this I could be bettter than most GMS. Quick random note I remember when the Jays signed AJ burnett for 55 mill for 5 years a lot of ppl said how awful it was. Given how much prices have gone up the past few years anyone signed like 2005 or earlier is an incredible bargain. [/ QUOTE ] People were saying it was ridiculous because the guy is very injury prone. He's pitched 135 and 165 innings in his 2 years in Toronto. If he can stay healthy he's a steal at 11 mil but only 140-150 innings a year from him doesn't make him a bargain.
|
|
#44
11-23-2007, 05:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Angels Sign Torii Hunter - 5 years $80M
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Who would you rather have Tori Hunter, at 32 , for 5 years at 16M per or Vernon Wells, turns 29 in a few weeks, for 6 more years at 18M per [/ QUOTE ] Wells. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#45
11-23-2007, 11:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Angels Sign Torii Hunter - 5 years $80M
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] how many 36 year old catchers put up, by far, their best career numbers. posada juiced = highly likely. not much to lose. i dont blame him for doing it. [/ QUOTE ] He must be on the juice. That's the only explanation. [/ QUOTE ] if he was on the juice this season, after the scrutiny that mlb took, his balls must be larger than his head. which incidentally would prove that he is not on steroids.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
