Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > High Stakes MTT
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-11-2007, 01:29 PM
Foucault Foucault is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: WSOP \'07 TR on web (see profile)
Posts: 3,661
Default Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi

Last level of Day 2A. Blinds are 1200/2400/300. I showed up at the table about two orbits ago with 330,000 chips, enough to cover everyone. Mizrachi is on my immediate right with about 150,000, which I think is like average. I haven't been at the table long enough to establish a strong image, but I probably look aggressive, I've already 3-bet Mizrachi from the button and open raised 2-3 times.

Folds to RM in the SB, he completes, I raise 5000 more with 44, he calls.

Flop 9 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. 12,700 in the pot. He checks, I bet 8000, he calls very quickly.

Turn Q [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. We both check.

River 2 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. He bets 12,000 into a pot of 28,700.

The interesting thing is that at the time, I didn't know this was Mizrachi, so I'm curious to know who calls this bet from an unknown and who calls from Mizrachi. It's a small decision, I know, but the difference in reasoning is important, I think.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2007, 01:33 PM
Cornell Fiji Cornell Fiji is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,888
Default Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi

Lots of draws on the flop.
I call the river.

I am less likely to call against a pro because you probably have the image of a competent/aggro player who would realize that you should call light because of the draws on the flop. I probably fold vs. a pro... or maybe bluff raise to 35,000? (note: I probably wouldn't have the balls to pull off a buff raise because you aren't representing much other than A2/QQ because it would be somewhat strange to slowplay a set on the turn, but it is a sexy play if you put him on a 6/9/Q which I believe make up a HUGE part of his range)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2007, 01:35 PM
8Adam8 8Adam8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 793
Default Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi

I am sooooo tempted to raise

This bet is usually a medium strength hand. I do not think he is sophisticated enough to understand a "fake blocking bet" and use it to induce a bluff-raise.

I am having trouble thinking of a hand he could have that would call a raise.

I think calling is ok vs his range, but its pretty marginal EV-wise.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-11-2007, 01:39 PM
Requin Requin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Back online
Posts: 6,446
Default Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi

I think this is an easy fold.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-2007, 01:44 PM
Mr.Poker Mr.Poker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: not playing enough...
Posts: 367
Default Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi

I think im in the push or fold camp. Calling is meh, as i suspect he has a mid pair on this board, probably something like 89/910.

I like raising to 36k, something which looks like you want a call, rather than a overbetting which could obv be a missed draw.

I know it effectively turns your hand into a bluff, but I can't see someone betting so small relative to the pot with a missed draw, it looks way more like a blocking bet from a mid pair, so in reality I dont think there is much value to calling.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-11-2007, 01:46 PM
Requin Requin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Back online
Posts: 6,446
Default Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi

A hand that can raise river will usually bet the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-11-2007, 01:48 PM
registrar registrar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Football\'s rubbish anyway
Posts: 5,430
Default Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi

I don't know how he plays but I think I'd fold here to anyone I thought was good. He's expecting you to call and he can beat at least ace high which means he can almost certainly beat 44. Obviously, I could be way off but that's the way I see it. In my second WSOP ME, I'd consider a raise.

Nice run chief. GL.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-11-2007, 01:53 PM
T_Mac T_Mac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 831
Default Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi

I think Mr.Poker nailed it and I'd probably fold.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-11-2007, 02:06 PM
Foucault Foucault is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: WSOP \'07 TR on web (see profile)
Posts: 3,661
Default Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi

Agreed that knowing it's Mizrachi makes it a fold because he's capable of betting medium-strength hands for value here. Not knowing it was him, however, I called, because random unknown WSOP players have very polarized river ranged. I felt to bet the river for value a lot of unknowns would need at least a Q (unlikely since that didn't come until turn) or a deuce (which is usually folded to my preflop raise), and thus that I'd see a bluff here maybe a third of the time. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-11-2007, 02:10 PM
registrar registrar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Football\'s rubbish anyway
Posts: 5,430
Default Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi

TBH, last hands of the day against the table big stack OOP, I'd expect a random/bad villain with a reasonable stack not to bluff that often and to bet more on a bluff when it does take his fancy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.