would you call this $20/180

[hyde]

PokerStars , $20+$2 Hold'em No Limit - Level VII (100/200) -
' 9-max Seat #2 is the button

Seat 1:hero (11695 in chips)
Seat 2: (1665 in chips)
Seat 4: not freddy (4740 in chips)
Seat 5: (10197 in chips)
Seat 6: (3125 in chips)
Seat 7: (12090 in chips)
Seat 8: (2810 in chips)
Seat 9: (8220 in chips)

*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to hero [Jd Ah]
: folds
: folds
: folds
: folds
hero CO: raises 400 to 600
: folds
not freddy: raises 4115 to 4715 and is all-in
: folds
hero:??

villain might well be a high volume poster here.
30 or so left, I'm 6th or so.
I am so certain he is playing positional poker here.
but do I risk 1/2 my stack to find out?

[Cornell Fiji]

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 47.180% 42.88% 04.30% 372985232 37406222.00 { AJs }
Hand 1: 52.820% 48.52% 04.30% 422052756 37406222.00 { 44+, A8s+, KQs, ATo+, KQo }

call

[TheFoxNL]

lol nice percentage

i dont know if your read is that hes playing positional poker id just call seeing you have 47% chance of winning

without the read i would fold

[Loc0Loc0]

Cornell you forgot to put some randoms in your range.

If you raised his blinds before it is a call.

[HitmanHaydon]

How active have you been?
I think this is a call unless you've been a rock.

[mastr]

btw we're not suited here

[JMurder3]

If you're sure of your read go for it...if you're just speculating, let it go.

[oe39]

seems like you could find better spots...

[reecelights]

You're getting 1.8:1 to call meaning you need 36% equity. Villain must be pushing ONLY 6% of hands for you to fold.

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

102,738,240 games 0.005 secs 20,547,648,000 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 35.982% 33.49% 02.49% 34409580 2557810.00 { AhJd }
Hand 1: 64.018% 61.53% 02.49% 63213040 2557810.00 { 88+, ATs+, KQs, AKo }


---

[Fiksdal]

[ QUOTE ]
seems like you could find better spots...

[/ QUOTE ]

Stop using this argument. The best spot you can find is calling an opponents push holding the nuts on the river. That doesn't mean you should pass up marginally good spots, just because a better one might occur later.