|
|
#11
10-10-2007, 07:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 16$ : 33
fold both hands! Second is really closer but still a fold IMO.
|
|
#12
10-10-2007, 07:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 16$ : 33
[ QUOTE ]
serious question. do you have any idea how to play SnGs? are you incredibly insecure about your game? [/ QUOTE ] Are you addressing this to me? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
#13
10-10-2007, 07:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 16$ : 33
yeah real small pairs like this you dont want to be raising early in sng's. both are pretty standard folds, ESPECIALLY after getting repopped with 33 that should be a turbomuck. if im playing these at all its not gonna be from MP this early. .
|
|
#14
10-10-2007, 07:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 16$ : 33
Addressed to OP pocketbear.
|
|
#15
10-10-2007, 07:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 16$ : 33
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] serious question. do you have any idea how to play SnGs? are you incredibly insecure about your game? [/ QUOTE ] Are you addressing this to me? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] no, should i have? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#16
10-10-2007, 07:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 16$ : 33
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] serious question. do you have any idea how to play SnGs? are you incredibly insecure about your game? [/ QUOTE ] Are you addressing this to me? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] definetively addressed to OP, IMO.
|
|
#17
10-10-2007, 08:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 16$ : 33
[ QUOTE ]
serious question. do you have any idea how to play SnGs? are you incredibly insecure about your game? you've posted some terribly played hands and some okay played hands and some good hands. basically, it seems like you post almost every hand you play. most of the hands you post are ridiculously standard spots that you're going to have to get used to playing automatically. that said. fold 3,3 for sure. the 4,4 is meh. [/ QUOTE ] I post hands when I think I played them badly and want some answers. Some hands looks "standard" for you but for me they are not yet standard. Is it a problem ?
|
|
#18
10-10-2007, 08:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 16$ : 33
Well just think about some things.
How does your hand do vs. someone calling a raise? 33 sucks balls because it's never dominating a lower pair and it's never dominating a high card with a kicker lower than your pair. It's always going to be in the 50/50 range and sometimes in the 20:80 range. Even tho it's 50/50 vs. a calling hand, you can't make it to showdown often enough to get your 50% share.
|
|
#19
10-11-2007, 04:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 16$ : 33
[ QUOTE ]
serious question. do you have any idea how to play SnGs? are you incredibly insecure about your game? you've posted some terribly played hands and some okay played hands and some good hands. basically, it seems like you post almost every hand you play. most of the hands you post are ridiculously standard spots that you're going to have to get used to playing automatically. that said. fold 3,3 for sure. the 4,4 is meh. [/ QUOTE ] I think this post is totally out of order, enough so to make me want to comment. The guy is trying to learn. He's clear that he doesn't know much. He doesn't know what's "standard" and what isn't. No one who doesn't want to has to answer his posts, but he's fully entitled to keep making them. A mod will let him know if they think he's posting too much. Please, let the guy learn. That's what we're here for, no? And Rodolphe, I suggest reading this: AleoMagus's Party 10+1 strategy. It's still pretty sound and will keep you out of too much trouble. Someone should do a list of posts at some point for beginners. Maybe I will some time. I'm pretty much a beginner myself, after all, which is why I appreciate people posting what seem to be dumb hands!
|
|
#20
10-11-2007, 05:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 16$ : 33
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] serious question. do you have any idea how to play SnGs? are you incredibly insecure about your game? you've posted some terribly played hands and some okay played hands and some good hands. basically, it seems like you post almost every hand you play. most of the hands you post are ridiculously standard spots that you're going to have to get used to playing automatically. that said. fold 3,3 for sure. the 4,4 is meh. [/ QUOTE ] I think this post is totally out of order, enough so to make me want to comment. The guy is trying to learn. He's clear that he doesn't know much. He doesn't know what's "standard" and what isn't. No one who doesn't want to has to answer his posts, but he's fully entitled to keep making them. A mod will let him know if they think he's posting too much. Please, let the guy learn. That's what we're here for, no? And Rodolphe, I suggest reading this: AleoMagus's Party 10+1 strategy. It's still pretty sound and will keep you out of too much trouble. Someone should do a list of posts at some point for beginners. Maybe I will some time. I'm pretty much a beginner myself, after all, which is why I appreciate people posting what seem to be dumb hands! [/ QUOTE ] wp.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
