#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL10 - letting go of overpairs
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (8 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)
MP2 ($12.02) CO ($2.14) Hero ($15.11) SB ($1.78) BB ($13.03) UTG ($5.33) UTG+1 ($2.20) MP1 ($2.71) Preflop: Hero is Button with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $0.4</font>, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, Hero calls $0.40, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>. Flop: ($0.95) 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets $0.8</font>, Hero calls $0.80. Turn: ($2.55) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets $2</font>, Hero... Villain is 18/13.6/1 over 110 hands. The hand just before this, I had just taken this same guy for a fairly big amount when I got a straight to beat his trip aces(he had AA, hit an A on the flop but didn't bet strongly enough), so he was probably still steaming a little over that too. Anyway, I'm just curious as to when I should let my overpair go here. Should I have 3bet him PF here? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL10 - letting go of overpairs
push turn....UTG doesn't have much left
you noted that he bet low with trips...his range includes alot that you beat here. I got you at 40/60 but a push meets that I believe. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL10 - letting go of overpairs
don't fold overpairs at nl10
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL10 - letting go of overpairs
[ QUOTE ]
push turn....UTG doesn't have much left you noted that he bet low with trips...his range includes alot that you beat here. I got you at 40/60 but a push meets that I believe. [/ QUOTE ] Hmm, I'm not sure I agree about his range, what do we beat? Overcards, AT, maybe a mid-pair. That's about it with an 13 pfr, no? I don't make these cards 40% of his range because this guy only really plays AT this way, although the tilt factor maybe would make him reckless. This looks really marginal to me, I think we have next to no fold equity here and so I think I would only call or shove based on the possibility of him tilting, otherwise I think this is a fold. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL10 - letting go of overpairs
[ QUOTE ]
don't fold overpairs at nl10 [/ QUOTE ] We do have a read, admittedly only 110 hands |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL10 - letting go of overpairs
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] don't fold overpairs at nl10 [/ QUOTE ] We do have a read, admittedly only 110 hands [/ QUOTE ] nothing in the read would lead to me folding here for 55bb |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL10 - letting go of overpairs
Villain is short, possibly steaming, and this is NL10. Push the turn.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL10 - letting go of overpairs
I think this is a fold.
Villans preflop range (UTG) is 22+, AT+ or so. Flop bet doesnt mean much but is this guy c-betting much? Turn bet I think means we are behind because - - Look at his agression factor, looks nitty/passive - He isnt betting enough to push you out here - He may be tilting from the last hand but he may also think you are a callstation. From the turn bet I think you can rule out all the small/med pairs that have not made sets and the overcards. The river bet confirms this line, does a passive postflop player fire 3 barrels with anything less than TPTK? That leaves one hand from his entire range that you beat - AT. |
|
|