#1
|
|||
|
|||
2-7 CP hand that I had trouble with
2-4 scoring system
367JQ [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 246789TQ Option 1: 367JQ [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 24678 QT9 Option 2: 7766T 23489 QQJ Option 3: QJT98 23467 Q76 Option 4: Chosen by you! What do you guys do here? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2-7 CP hand that I had trouble with
Option 3 is obviously worse than JT987 23467 QQ6, which might be worse than T9876 23467 QQJ. I suspect #1 scores the best, though.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2-7 CP hand that I had trouble with
Wild-ass guess: I like 789TJ 23467 QQ6. I think making #2 in the middle and queens in front more than makes up for the relatively weak back.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2-7 CP hand that I had trouble with
I was close, it looks like going with QQJ in front might be a tiny bit better. From a sample of 12825 opponent hands, here are the undominated options:
-2.7568 8d9hTcJsQd 2c3s4d6h6s 7c7sQs -2.41481 7c8d9hTcJs 2c3s4d6h6s 7sQdQs -2.28881 8d9hTcJsQd 2c3s4d6hQs 6s7c7s -1.1848 3s6s7sJsQs 2c4d6h7c8d 9hTcQd -0.858012 8d9hTcJsQd 2c3s4d6h7c 6s7sQs 0.39462 7c8d9hTcJs 2c3s4d6h7s 6sQdQs 0.39883 6h7c8d9hTc 2c3s4d6s7s JsQdQs As you can see, the flush is a losing option. Making a weak flush can't compensate for a weaker middle and a very weak front. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2-7 CP hand that I had trouble with
P.S. I tried a couple different suit assignments to get some idea how accurate my sample was (removing the truly awful options).
dddccchh: -1.16457 3s6s7sJsQs 2d4d6d7c8c 9cThQh 12742 -0.832522 8c9cThJsQh 2d3s4d6d7c 6s7sQs 12742 0.422854 7c8c9cThJs 2d3s4d6d7s 6sQhQs 12742 0.429054 6d7c8c9cTh 2d3s4d6s7s JsQhQs 12742 hhhdddcc: -1.18815 3s6s7sJsQs 2h4h6h7d8d 9dTcQc 12692 -0.842972 8d9dTcJsQc 2h3s4h6h7d 6s7sQs 12692 0.439332 7d8d9dTcJs 2h3s4h6h7s 6sQcQs 12692 0.450441 6h7d8d9dTc 2h3s4h6s7s JsQcQs 12692 ccddhhcc: -1.21522 3s6s7sJsQs 2c4c6d7d8h 9hTcQc 12810 -0.874707 8h9hTcJsQc 2c3s4c6d7d 6s7sQs 12810 0.371741 7d8h9hTcJs 2c3s4c6d7s 6sQcQs 12810 0.378454 6d7d8h9hTc 2c3s4c6s7s JsQcQs 12810 hhhhccdd: -1.16418 3s6s7sJsQs 2h4h6h7h8c 9cTdQd 12669 -0.847186 8c9cTdJsQd 2h3s4h6h7h 6s7sQs 12669 0.399479 7h8c9cTdJs 2h3s4h6h7s 6sQdQs 12669 0.41124 6h7h8c9cTd 2h3s4h6s7s JsQdQs 12669 ccccdddd (Completely live hearts): -1.22496 3s6s7sJsQs 2c4c6c7c8d 9dTdQd 12602 -0.958261 8d9dTdJsQd 2c3s4c6c7c 6s7sQs 12602 0.302571 7c8d9dTdJs 2c3s4c6c7s 6sQdQs 12602 0.310586 6c7c8d9dTd 2c3s4c6s7s JsQdQs 12602 hhhhcccc (completely live diamonds) -1.217 3s6s7sJsQs 2h4h6h7h8c 9cTcQc 12894 -0.953389 8c9cTcJsQc 2h3s4h6h7h 6s7sQs 12894 0.318753 7h8c9cTcJs 2h3s4h6h7s 6sQcQs 12894 0.330541 6h7h8c9cTc 2h3s4h6s7s JsQcQs 12894 The choice of suits and different random samples thus seem to impact EV by about 1/10th of a point--- not enough to affect the best choice here. |
|
|