Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:07 PM
KEW KEW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,883
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

I hate time limits!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:08 PM
TheEngineer TheEngineer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,730
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Are they done for the day or will they be back?

[/ QUOTE ]

They'll be back. Glad I'm working from home today.
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:11 PM
flight2q flight2q is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: waking up with cowboys
Posts: 379
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Nice of Catherine Hanaway to finally admit that poker sites haven't been used to launder money via chip dumping.

[/ QUOTE ]

I assume you're joking. But I have to consider that maybe she did and I missed it. The feed keeps crapping out on me and I have to relaunch it.
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:12 PM
KEW KEW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,883
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
I hate Goodlatte.

[/ QUOTE ]

He is sounding very angry..That holds well for us..IMO his agruement about the WTO made him look like a moron..He wants to cry and take his ball home..
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:14 PM
TheEngineer TheEngineer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,730
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nice of Catherine Hanaway to finally admit that poker sites haven't been used to launder money via chip dumping.

[/ QUOTE ]

I assume you're joking. But I have to consider that maybe she did and I missed it. The feed keeps crapping out on me and I have to relaunch it.

[/ QUOTE ]

No...she really said it.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:15 PM
KEW KEW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,883
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nice of Catherine Hanaway to finally admit that poker sites haven't been used to launder money via chip dumping.

[/ QUOTE ]

I assume you're joking. But I have to consider that maybe she did and I missed it. The feed keeps crapping out on me and I have to relaunch it.

[/ QUOTE ]

She 100% admitted that there has been no money laundering other then the "illegal gambling" money...
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:19 PM
PPABryan PPABryan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 24
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

I think Bobby Scott was excellent and knowledgable and is following up very well on what he spoke to us about at the fly-in....more Q&A to follow and it should be worth hearing to say the least, too bad the vote was now it was really heating up


Bryan Spadaro
Membership Relations, Manager
Poker Players Alliance
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:19 PM
tangled tangled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 318
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

Hannaway’s testimony and her description of the DOJ’s position that all placing of bets online is illegal, provides a big opportunity for us I think. Because of this position it might be possible to make the horse racing industry and major sports feel criminally vulnerable and thereby turn their powerful lobbies to help legalize online gaming. To do this, pressure has to be put on the DOJ to make some kind of arrest towards these groups.

Also, does this situation provide an equal protection issue? I know prosecutors have a great deal of discretion, but this situation is so over the top that it smacks of something more than discretion used with good faith.
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:19 PM
flight2q flight2q is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: waking up with cowboys
Posts: 379
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Goodlatte: "What if it wasn't gambling we accidently allowed, but Cocaine, or Rocket Grenades from Columbia: How would you feel then"

[/ QUOTE ]

Weiler has been chewing them up. But from what I heard he neglected to mention here that cocaine is different because we don't have USA companies legally providing cocaine in USA (AFAIK). Great work making it clear what he was commenting on (why moral argument didn't pass muster with WTO) and getting his point across.

and LOL - Beer Positioning System FTW.
These Luddites really don't understand technology - that's why they keep claiming money laundering is a bigger risk online than at B&M.
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:21 PM
Orlando Salazar Orlando Salazar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DUCY
Posts: 1,353
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

Uhh yeah, I could easily go to vegas and trade some guy cash for his chips then cashout at the cage AND pay my taxes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.