|
|
#11
10-18-2007, 12:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
[ QUOTE ]
I have a proposition. Let's refer to Phil Hellmuth as Phil Hellmuth rather than "Brat." [/ QUOTE ] Who cares either way? Is OP insulting your idol or something? 
|
|
#14
10-18-2007, 08:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I have a proposition. Let's refer to Phil Hellmuth as Phil Hellmuth rather than "Brat." [/ QUOTE ]  [/ QUOTE ] its still retarded
|
|
#15
10-19-2007, 04:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=OUmfuuS27...ed&search=
He bets the flop smaller than his original raise? And then calls the river?!?!
|
|
#16
10-19-2007, 07:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
[ QUOTE ]
http://youtube.com/watch?v=OUmfuuS27...ed&search= He bets the flop smaller than his original raise? And then calls the river?!?! [/ QUOTE ] The bet was designed to get Erik to raise on a bluff or a lesser hand. And would you look at that, it worked. The river was a crying call.
|
|
#17
10-19-2007, 07:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] http://youtube.com/watch?v=OUmfuuS27...ed&search= He bets the flop smaller than his original raise? And then calls the river?!?! [/ QUOTE ] The bet was designed to get Erik to raise on a bluff or a lesser hand. And would you look at that, it worked. The river was a crying call. [/ QUOTE ] Eric's not gonna bluff there. If he though Eric had made a hand, he should have just put out a strong cb. And what can he beat on the river?
|
|
#18
10-19-2007, 05:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
[ QUOTE ]
- This one, which was weird. Just as I was rubbing my hands expecting Seidel to take a big chunk out of Hellmuth, he waited till he was beat and then bet. [/ QUOTE ] Eric knows Phil plays primarily premium cards. With no King on the board, there was at least a pretty good chance Phil was holding one. If it's the K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Eric is effed. So, checking to the river, IMO, wasn't a bad play. My guess is that the bet river was a blocking bet to keep Phil from going all-in. In the end, it worked out well for Eric, as he could've lost a lot more in the hand. He doesn't have all those bracelets for nothing.
|
|
#19
10-22-2007, 08:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
i think he butchered the hand imo
|
|
#20
10-26-2007, 01:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] - This one, which was weird. Just as I was rubbing my hands expecting Seidel to take a big chunk out of Hellmuth, he waited till he was beat and then bet. [/ QUOTE ] Eric knows Phil plays primarily premium cards. With no King on the board, there was at least a pretty good chance Phil was holding one. If it's the K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Eric is effed. So, checking to the river, IMO, wasn't a bad play. My guess is that the bet river was a blocking bet to keep Phil from going all-in. In the end, it worked out well for Eric, as he could've lost a lot more in the hand. He doesn't have all those bracelets for nothing. [/ QUOTE ] So you're basicly saying Seidel doesn't bet the flop and the turn because he knows Hellmuth will outdraw him on the river with pretty much exactly the K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]? That's so result oriented and doesn't make sense.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
