Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #371  
Old 11-21-2007, 01:38 AM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread

[ QUOTE ]
I just get tired of the general disrespect many people here show.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is really begging for...

Move up to where they respect your raises!
Reply With Quote
  #372  
Old 11-21-2007, 01:40 AM
pattay pattay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: owned by all except too eazy
Posts: 781
Default Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread

[ QUOTE ]

I respect my opponents.

[/ QUOTE ]

found a leak [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #373  
Old 11-21-2007, 01:41 AM
TheProdigy TheProdigy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: BLOG INSIDE
Posts: 3,254
Default Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly, every single player at NL100 is completely awful except for UPay. He's decent, but not worth avoiding him. 1Pokerboy is ok most of the time, but spews in stupid spots. Everyone else that is good primarily plays higher (bottomset, BIGlivesON, KarlSpakler, and a few others).

[/ QUOTE ]

How much money are you making CDL? All I here from a bunch of you guys is how horrible we all play... and then you mention your tiny rolls, or talk about how you're running bad or close to broke?

If being completly awful nets 450$ a day with FPP's I shudder to think what kind of cash you studs are making.

I've played with you a bit and from what I've seen you're nothing special.

[/ QUOTE ]

im with CDL. we all suck. theres like 3 good players in this forum. we may not suck relative to our competition, but we suck. and FWIW, i highly doubt CDL meant to imply hes better

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with this, in a way, but I really couldn't care less in the sense that I'm absolutely murdering NL100 (not that I'm not running hot) while basically playing ABC poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

Guys:

Going out of your way to outplay regs is not the same thing as them going out of their way to outplay you. Ask lordyefc, beatpurdue, etc who I have encountered. All of them went out of their way to outplay me. I noticed this very quick(this is very important), and am like 4+ buyins up on all of them.

If you say you need to go out of your way to outplay regs then you are delusional. That is not something you have to do to win. But you of course have to adjust to any reg that is dumb enough to outplay you on purpose.

SABR; You don't play a TAG game. You have to outplay regs or they will try to outplay you because of your style. You are also better than most of the regs at the levels you play. The normal person playing 100nl isn't much better than the other regs so trying to outplay them is a bad idea, and IMO, bad advice. If you come to 400nl and go out of your way to outplay too eazy, GM, etc, then you are going to hurt your winrate because they are close to or better than you. This is the kind've thing I am talking about for the advice, don't try to outplay good regs that may be close to you in levels.
Reply With Quote
  #374  
Old 11-21-2007, 01:48 AM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread

[ QUOTE ]
SABR; You don't play a TAG game.

[/ QUOTE ]
How would you classify my game? To be honest I don't know how to classify my game either. The terms "TAG" and "LAG" have blurry boundaries.

[ QUOTE ]
don't try to outplay good regs that may be close to you in levels.

[/ QUOTE ]
Fair point. Obv trying to outplay people who are better than you is a bad idea.
Reply With Quote
  #375  
Old 11-21-2007, 01:51 AM
TheProdigy TheProdigy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: BLOG INSIDE
Posts: 3,254
Default Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread

SABR; Haven't played vs you in so long that I couldn't give you a fair classification.

Your loc does say LAGing it up though [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #376  
Old 11-21-2007, 01:54 AM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly, every single player at NL100 is completely awful except for UPay. He's decent, but not worth avoiding him. 1Pokerboy is ok most of the time, but spews in stupid spots. Everyone else that is good primarily plays higher (bottomset, BIGlivesON, KarlSpakler, and a few others).

[/ QUOTE ]

How much money are you making CDL? All I here from a bunch of you guys is how horrible we all play... and then you mention your tiny rolls, or talk about how you're running bad or close to broke?

If being completly awful nets 450$ a day with FPP's I shudder to think what kind of cash you studs are making.

I've played with you a bit and from what I've seen you're nothing special.

[/ QUOTE ]


I never said I was good, but I am at least as good as most stars NL100 regs. None of us is good though. Also, money per day is a stupid comparison. I have never made more than 13k vpp in a month so I couldn't pull down more than a 1 ptbb/100 winner that playes 150k hands/month even if I was killing the games. I don't think I've ever played 30k total hands in a month much less that many at nl100. I'm kind of a semi-reg I guess. Also, I do infact lose at non-NL games so my roll is smaller due to that, but I'm working on it.

Prodigy, I don't mean stupid stuff. I just mean the stuff like when a flop comes 864 and you cold called a pfr with 33 then you can raise and rep a set instead of fold like most regs do repeatedly. Its simple yet effective. If they shove you fold.
Reply With Quote
  #377  
Old 11-21-2007, 02:28 AM
ASPoker8 ASPoker8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Titletown (Boston, UF)
Posts: 13,738
Default Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread

Slammedfire is the worst player at Stars 200NL Full Ring
Reply With Quote
  #378  
Old 11-21-2007, 02:32 AM
pterodactyl_ pterodactyl_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Owning Foxwoods
Posts: 842
Default Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Slammedfire is the worst player at Stars 200NL Full Ring

[/ QUOTE ]

He's not good but I hardly think he is the worst
Reply With Quote
  #379  
Old 11-21-2007, 02:34 AM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Slammedfire is the worst player at Stars 200NL Full Ring

[/ QUOTE ]

He's not good but I hardly think he is the worst

[/ QUOTE ]

yea...I'm the worst for sure at NL200.
Reply With Quote
  #380  
Old 11-21-2007, 02:36 AM
pterodactyl_ pterodactyl_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Owning Foxwoods
Posts: 842
Default Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Slammedfire is the worst player at Stars 200NL Full Ring

[/ QUOTE ]

He's not good but I hardly think he is the worst

[/ QUOTE ]

yea...I'm the worst for sure at NL200.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didnt want to say it but...

[img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.