|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rake consideration
I am typically playing 1 and sometimes 2 6-max tables and also some heads up.
My limit now is $1.5/3. I am very picky with rake back deals but I am starting to wonder - maybe correctly - if I should just see 25/50/75% as the same - a little extra money if you happen to play there. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rake consideration
its not the same, and while percentages are the same for someone who plays 1-2 tables vs someone who plays 8+ the real money seems almost irrelevant to me doing 1-2 unless you play ALOT of hands
i would just game select...but you could prolly figure this out pretty easily using PT and some basic math |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rake consideration
I was born lazy. :\
Optimal would be someone with experience in the same type of situation. I also dont really get the logic that plaing "ALOT" of hand would mean that rakeback is more importnat. Winrate/100hands and rake rate should be all that matters? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rake consideration
thats why i said the percentages are the same but realistically i wouldnt care about my rake back if i put in the same number of hours i do now but only played 1-2 tables...it would be an insignificant amount of money
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rake consideration
I have found that 200nl at PP is about $0.1 a hand in rake. Can anyone here post how much they pay at 400 and 600nl please...
|
|
|