Possibly ignored AP cheating acct (modnote: nah)

[ibluffoldladies]

case closed. I'll take your word since you've been speaking out against AP the entire time.

[Dan Druff]

[ QUOTE ]
Sponsor isnt a cheat account, I kill him all the time at 25/50 HU 08

edit- and theres no [censored] way he can see my cards

[/ QUOTE ]

When was the last time you played him? If he's still around, I will accept that he just is aggro and lucky and move on.

[mntbikr15]

Today....and we often play a long time

edit- Ill post a few hands later when im not playing

[adanthar]

[ QUOTE ]
In cases like this, if you assume the house is playing accounts, you have to look at complete sessions instead of individual hands. That seems fair don't you think?

[/ QUOTE ]

no

1)it has to fit the M.O.
2)have fun pointing fingers at every single high stakes donk at AP over the last year (there were a lot, just ask ikestoys)
3)this is dumb

[ibluffoldladies]

[ QUOTE ]

3)this is dumb

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, have to disagree. I think it's a good intellectual question.

[getterdone36]

^^^^me too, user 363 has been around for along time, AP has admitted there is other accounts, they wont say who they are, doesnt hurt to ask

[R*R]

well the dramabomb was fun for a while but it seems to be a dud....

[adanthar]

you can obv ask, but please don't out names without more than this - PM people instead. you HS AP guys are a small enough club to do that easily anyway.

[jfish]

i bet modding this stuff is very tedious.

[ibluffoldladies]

[ QUOTE ]
well the dramabomb was fun for a while but it seems to be a dud....

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, if mntbiker is speaking against this, then it's a false lead. He's been one of the more vocal posters against AP.