|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably retarded question HU
[ QUOTE ]
i think im ahead way more than 50%. hes just that predictable. but i think it needs to be a draw like... 85%+ so yeah i folded [/ QUOTE ] You seem to have a pretty good idea how his range looks like, so you basically ask sb to do the math for you by starting this thread?! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably retarded question HU
This hand is similar to one posted by HEK where hero had 66 on a 345 board and consensus was to c/r ai. The reverse here is villain doesn't need a strong hand for your hand to have little value.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably retarded question HU
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i think im ahead way more than 50%. hes just that predictable. but i think it needs to be a draw like... 85%+ so yeah i folded [/ QUOTE ] You seem to have a pretty good idea how his range looks like, so you basically ask sb to do the math for you by starting this thread?! [/ QUOTE ] ok instead of ridiculing u for that response im just gonna ask u to elaborate. what do u mean by this post? whats ur point? please. id like to know. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably retarded question HU
Dont know whats so hard to understand. These posts made me believe you can give villain an adequate range :
[ QUOTE ] i think im ahead way more than 50%. hes just that predictable. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i kinda strongly suspect he will pull this BS with stuff like naked 7x, misguided semibluff with A4, A5 or A3. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] hes folding a huge amount of flops and is generally super readable postflop. [/ QUOTE ] So it should all just come down to a math problem, no? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably retarded question HU
well congrats u solved the puzzle. u realize that all situations in poker can be solved once u have a range and some odds etc? i dont know his range and i wanted input on it, so i asked. shouldnt i have?
|
|
|