Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: If you are a white male, have you ever had sex with an Asian female?
No 36 83.72%
Yes 7 16.28%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:07 PM
Stake Monster Stake Monster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: chair
Posts: 2,734
Default Re: FTP Answers 6/7

I guess I'll chime in with some whining too. The lag today was really bad and the first time I experienced it on FTP. I've always loved FTP for its software and I hope it doesn't last too long.
Reply With Quote
  #202  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:07 PM
drtofu66 drtofu66 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30
Default Re: FTP Answers 6/7

[ QUOTE ]
Doug:

SSNL'ers and below are already jumping ship and moving their bankrolls to other sites.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was wondering why there weren't as many full ring tables available at the microstakes.

Great, now the table selection sucks because of this update.
Reply With Quote
  #203  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:11 PM
britdevine britdevine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 108
Default Re: FTP Answers 6/7

Will we be credited for ironman status. I dont want to lose my ironman level cuz FTP sux at updating.
Reply With Quote
  #204  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:14 PM
bodogplayer bodogplayer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9
Default Re: FTP Answers 6/7

Wow, what an experiment that has terribly gone wrong.

Recently, I left Bodog and joined the playing group at Full Tilt. I enjoyed the fact that it was possible to play more than three tables at once, the current limitation at Bodog. Now with this update I can play only one table without risking the above named problems listed by the other posters. It is now very difficult to keep a full ring game going.

Please, the powers that be, seek out an immediate solution.
Reply With Quote
  #205  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:15 PM
TheDailyLlama TheDailyLlama is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8
Default Re: FTP Answers 6/7

Still about 42k players on the site willing to put up with this. Can't see FTP being too concerned about a quick fix when they are still getting those numbers. Or is that actually low for this time of the day?
Reply With Quote
  #206  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:21 PM
ajmargarine ajmargarine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: one decision
Posts: 12,050
Default Re: FTP Answers 6/7

If it's as bad for everyone as everyone is saying, their rake numbers have to be down down down.

Someone make sure they report it here when they do the ROLLBACK to yesterdays software, so I can go play some pokah. For now, it's Spurs-Cavs.
Reply With Quote
  #207  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:21 PM
Dave_K Dave_K is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 125
Default Re: FTP Answers 6/7

TheDailyLlama that is how many people are logged on, not how many are playing. Obviously myself and others are still logged on.
Reply With Quote
  #208  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:24 PM
morphd morphd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 418
Default Re: FTP Answers 6/7

This is hilarious, I've never had any issues at FT, now I know what all the complaining was about.

My only wish is that I'd have started playing Stars since Jan. so I'd have a shot at good SN rewards.
Reply With Quote
  #209  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:34 PM
Kowalski Kowalski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: FUBARRRRRR
Posts: 1,092
Default Re: FTP Answers 6/7

I thought everyone was just being whiney... Logged in for a session to see for myself, and I don't know how anyone is still playing. Just do a [censored] rollback.
Reply With Quote
  #210  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:45 PM
mosuavea mosuavea is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: calling with the nuts
Posts: 2,154
Default Re: FTP Answers 6/7

If I released this software at my job with this amount of money on the line my boss would fire me if I didnt get it rectified yesterday.

I just dont understand why you don't rollback the software until you ironed out the quirks. It makes utterly no sense whatsoever that the company would rather receive a bad rep and lose money at the same time than rollback a bug ridden peice of software.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.