|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
He's not 2+2 is he? Also LapocaFlame was really a thorn in my side today. We were 3betting and 4betting each other all day. In one key hand we got it AIPF with TT and 99. I lost. And have you guys seen LapocaRay who has the same avatar? And last month there was a different Lapocaxxxxx also with the same avatar. Seems like they're putting together a clan. [/ QUOTE ] Yea, I Don't play w/ avatars, but, I noticed all the Lapoca names popping up past few months, they never chat w/ me though, so Idk. I personally think Lapocaflame is not very good, and I think he is one of the more TAGfishy regulars. I won't elaborate further, incase he reads this. I've come across as a big enough dick already, last thing I need to do is give away why I feel the way I do and cost myself $$. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
Thoughts on FRiaR SKanK at 3/6?
I think he's a TAGfish who keeps coolering me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
For the most part IMO the best players try their hardest to give off the impression that although they have tag stats (which they cant hide) that they really suck(so youll keep playing them).
caveat: this probably isnt the case for most 200nl and lower players. mebbe 200 but certianly not 100. at cash games i go to im often known that the worst player there (who hasnt had a losing night yet =) ) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
For the most part IMO the best players try their hardest to give off the impression that although they have tag stats (which they cant hide) that they really suck(so youll keep playing them). caveat: this probably isnt the case for most 200nl and lower players. mebbe 200 but certianly not 100. at cash games i go to im often known that the worst player there (who hasnt had a losing night yet =) ) [/ QUOTE ] One of my good friends once told me that the reason I fare well against regs is because I spew enough in spots with decent equity (FE or pot equity) where I could have easily gotten away from it and thus I get looked up lighter. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
Hey guys, i am new here at 2p2... anyways just noticed the full ring forum and that is my main game so i wanted to register and start posting on here. I am a regular on PS, 100NL and 200NL so i will see u guys at the tables....
also i wanted my screen name on here to be fast_prophet and my p was sticking and i wasn't paying enough attention to see that i missed the second p, is there a way to change that? anyways why i really wanted to post, what r ur thoughts on Alex916f who usually plays 100NL full ring, he has been giving me trouble lately seems pretty aggro... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
looosefer?
mustangino? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
loosefer is one of like 2 regs up on me a lot(TY [censored] YOU GRANDMELON).
loosefer is a good aggro player, with some bad tendencies to stack off light(although he does suck out each time he stacks off) mustang is crazy. He uses his small stack to an advantage but has many many leaks. I am not going to post them here because I feel he probably reads this forum. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
Prod why don't I ever see you at the tables anymore? I rarely see GM or Q-tip either now that I think of it.
And does anyone use epassorte for withdrawls? SABR - PM me your sn and I'll tell you who all the winning regs are at 3/6 & 5/10. Skank is one of them btw. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Prod why don't I ever see you at the tables anymore? I rarely see GM or Q-tip either now that I think of it. And does anyone use epassorte for withdrawls? SABR - PM me your sn and I'll tell you who all the winning regs are at 3/6 & 5/10. Skank is one of them btw. [/ QUOTE ] Ive been busy with school and only get to play for like 45 minutes if I actually do find time |
|
|