#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL suitable spot for set-mining?
You have position, and by 3 betting you take control of the pot. You have a chance to take the pot away from TT-QQ if an ace or king hit and you c-bet. If you just call and the flop comes Q-8-5, what do you do with his c-bet? Do you automatically fold? Do you float it?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL suitable spot for set-mining?
[ QUOTE ]
You have position, and by 3 betting you take control of the pot. You have a chance to take the pot away from TT-QQ if an ace or king hit and you c-bet. If you just call and the flop comes Q-8-5, what do you do with his c-bet? Do you automatically fold? Do you float it? [/ QUOTE ] ...and when he calls you down with JJ you can write in chat box: "how could you call that bet with only JJ?!? Donk!!!" |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL suitable spot for set-mining?
Ah,but when he calls with JJ, and the fop comes K-x-x, we win!
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL suitable spot for set-mining?
also true...
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL suitable spot for set-mining?
Thanks to everyone for the feedback - especially the following:
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] call if less than 5% of effective stacks, fold if over 10%, and make a judgement call between 5% and 10%) [/ QUOTE ] that's a very good rule to determine to call or not. But isn't call justified when effective stack is only 8 times bigger cause you flop set in 13% of the time? [maybe my knowing of odds is oldschool or wrong, though, hah]. Sure, in that case we are left with no buffer to further reraises. [/ QUOTE ] This would only be true if we stack him every time we hit our set, which is nowhere close to true. [/ QUOTE ] I used to use the "I'll stack them if I hit" line but am getting more realistic in estimating implied odds. I like the 5/10 shortcut. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL suitable spot for set-mining?
call that for set mining all day.
|
|
|