Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:09 AM
Moovyz Moovyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NC no poker here!
Posts: 127
Default Are the more vocal players weaker?

Obviously, the more you talk during a hand the more chance that you may "give away" info that will hurt you. We have seen this several times, a few with Daniel.

But overall, I think the more vocal players (Gold, Zeidman, Farha) are weaker BECAUSE of this tendancy. Guys like Gus, Doyle, Todd, Antonio are overall better players because they give so little away.

A few talk during hands (like Daniel) but basically only to themselves and not with more streets to come, so I don't consider that the same or damaging.

Anyone else agree with this "generality"?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:23 AM
van_exel_fan van_exel_fan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 108
Default Re: Are the more vocal players weaker?

I talk a ton but any time I make a decent sized bet (bluff of not) I stfu.

Edit: I wouldn't put Negreanu and Farha in the same class as Jamie Gold and Cory Zeidman.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:34 AM
Moovyz Moovyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NC no poker here!
Posts: 127
Default Re: Are the more vocal players weaker?

I didn't put Daniel in the same group. I think Farha does talk too much but he offsets his bad play by being very aggresive and ragging out a bit more. But on the whole, I think he's a loser on this show (before this week).

If I had a choice of backing Brad Booth or Sammy Farha, I'd easily go with Brad.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:45 AM
Dan87 Dan87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 3,977
Default Re: Are the more vocal players weaker?

antonio talks a lot what are you smoking
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-20-2007, 01:10 AM
istewart istewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,990
Default Re: Are the more vocal players weaker?

You're looking at this a bit in the wrong way. There are two types of players that get noticed enough for you to know about them. A few are actually good players. The rest are [censored] who talk a lot or who wear stupid sweatshirts and stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-20-2007, 02:06 AM
Moovyz Moovyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NC no poker here!
Posts: 127
Default Re: Are the more vocal players weaker?

He doesn't talk much during the hand, ie: speculating. I don't see him giving anything away about his hand. The others I mentioned are always "well, I got a big hand, I can't lay this down" etc.

The longer this banter goes on, the more likely they are to give away key info.

Jamie does it, so badly, that I don't think he could ever beat these guys without getting hit in the head with the deck. Farha does it alot, and I see him losing more than winning. The really quiet ones, Booth, Hansen, Lederer... the list goes on and on... they seem to win more/higher than the mouthy ones.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-20-2007, 02:32 AM
JokersAttack JokersAttack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 940
Default Re: Are the more vocal players weaker?

[ QUOTE ]
I didn't put Daniel in the same group. I think Farha does talk too much but he offsets his bad play by being very aggresive and ragging out a bit more. But on the whole, I think he's a loser on this show (before this week).

If I had a choice of backing Brad Booth or Sammy Farha, I'd easily go with Brad.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sammy has taken LAG to a new level, and his image allows him to profit from monster holdings. This season he hasn't had too many monsters, and if he gets hit by the deck, he is liable to go from a loser to a huge winner, very quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-20-2007, 10:59 AM
jogsxyz jogsxyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,167
Default Re: Are the more vocal players weaker?

The main difference bet Daniel and Jamie is Daniel mostly speaks when he is the defender. It's already clear that Daniel is in a call or fold mode. His talking didn't give any information. By just thinking it known that Daniel has a decision to make. Therefore no additional information.
Jamie talks when he's the bettor. Players should remain silent when they're the aggressor. Only two things can happen. One is neutral and the another is bad.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-20-2007, 11:41 AM
Bonified Bonified is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slave to the grind
Posts: 471
Default Re: Are the more vocal players weaker?

[ QUOTE ]
You're looking at this a bit in the wrong way. There are two types of players that get noticed enough for you to know about them. A few are actually good players. The rest are [censored] who talk a lot or who wear stupid sweatshirts and stuff.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ding ! Selection bias strikes yet again.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-21-2007, 04:45 AM
TurnerLFC08 TurnerLFC08 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Default Re: Are the more vocal players weaker?

Players like Daniel Negreanu, Jamie Gold, and Gavin Smith talk a lot because its the way they play and they want there opponent to think they are giving a lot of information away
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.