|
|
#12
11-25-2007, 09:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Turbo With Hidden Voting
actually, that gave me an idea. a WW game where everyone is a neutral with their own win condition. there would be a lynching each day, and some people would have the ability to perform night actions, but no nightkills. masonries could be formed between blocs of players who would ostensibly have a mutual agenda but whose true intentions would be their own. THEN secret voting, with no reveal or limited reveal, would be applicable and probably essential.
|
|
#13
11-25-2007, 09:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo With Hidden Voting
Although...
One thing we're forgetting is -- last second vote changes. "I know I said I was going to vote for xxxx, but I changed my mind with 5 seconds left." Wolf statement or villager statement? More metagame!
|
|
#14
11-25-2007, 09:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo With Hidden Voting
[ QUOTE ]
actually, that gave me an idea. a WW game where everyone is a neutral with their own win condition. there would be a lynching each day, and some people would have the ability to perform night actions, but no nightkills. masonries could be formed between blocs of players who would ostensibly have a mutual agenda but whose true intentions would be their own. THEN secret voting, with no reveal or limited reveal, would be applicable and probably essential. [/ QUOTE ] This sounds a lot like Vendettas
|
|
#15
11-25-2007, 09:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo With Hidden Voting
[ QUOTE ]
Although... One thing we're forgetting is -- last second vote changes. "I know I said I was going to vote for xxxx, but I changed my mind with 5 seconds left." Wolf statement or villager statement? More metagame! [/ QUOTE ] You say that like more metagame is a desirable and good thing [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#16
11-25-2007, 09:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo With Hidden Voting
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] actually, that gave me an idea. a WW game where everyone is a neutral with their own win condition. there would be a lynching each day, and some people would have the ability to perform night actions, but no nightkills. masonries could be formed between blocs of players who would ostensibly have a mutual agenda but whose true intentions would be their own. THEN secret voting, with no reveal or limited reveal, would be applicable and probably essential. [/ QUOTE ] This sounds a lot like Vendettas [/ QUOTE ] Not that that's a problem. Vendettas-style games rule.
|
|
#17
11-25-2007, 09:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo With Hidden Voting
i started to try and read Vendettas a couple of times. it looked hopelessly complex, so i gave it up. i think a lot of the games with highly involved powers and rulesets are almost impossible to make sense of when reading it cold. if you're experiencing it dynamically its probably much easier.
|
|
#19
11-25-2007, 09:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo With Hidden Voting
[ QUOTE ]
if you're experiencing it dynamically its probably much easier. [/ QUOTE ] I played Vendettas 1 and didn't like it much (can't speak for any sequels). Anyone who already won, or who had the game locked up, had no incentive to keep going. Hell, I didn't even have a lock (was maybe 80% to win) and I stopped caring after day 3.
|
|
#20
11-25-2007, 09:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo With Hidden Voting
It's impossible to appreciate the awesomeness of Vendettas unless in the game.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
