Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-08-2007, 04:40 PM
pokerbobo pokerbobo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Takin a log to the beaver
Posts: 1,318
Default Re: Thoughts on the Democratic Debate

Good thing the job he's going for doesn't require any tough decisions to be made.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-09-2007, 03:06 AM
Max Raker Max Raker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 708
Default Re: Thoughts on the Democratic Debate

[ QUOTE ]
But seriously, who the [censored] cares if Bonds gets invited to the Whitehouse? Do people really vote based on that kinda stuff?

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably just Barry Bonds [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-09-2007, 11:40 AM
NickMPK NickMPK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,626
Default Re: Thoughts on the Democratic Debate


As an Edwards supporter, I was disappointed with my candidate's performance. It was a forum he really should have won, and he didn't particularly distinguish himself. But I think the only memorable performance overall was Kucinich; it wasn't a big moment for any of the front-runners.

BTW, the reason that Gravel was not in the debate wasn't his low poll numbers or crazy persona. It was because he declined to fill out the paperwork necessary to seek the AFL-CIO endorsement.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-09-2007, 12:18 PM
Berge20 Berge20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Grinding Away
Posts: 4,989
Default Re: Thoughts on the Democratic Debate

[ QUOTE ]
btw, where was Mike Gravel?

[/ QUOTE ]

Apparently he failed (or chose not) to fill out an AFL-CIO questionaire or something.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-09-2007, 12:25 PM
iron81 iron81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Resident Donk
Posts: 6,806
Default Re: Thoughts on the Democratic Debate

According to a Tribune article, all of the GOP contenders were invited as well. I'm surprised none of the 2nd tier candidates showed up: the press from a GOP candidate crashing the Dems debate would have been worth it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-09-2007, 12:30 PM
JackWhite JackWhite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,554
Default Re: Thoughts on the Democratic Debate

[ QUOTE ]
According to a Tribune article, all of the GOP contenders were invited as well. I'm surprised none of the 2nd tier candidates showed up: the press from a GOP candidate crashing the Dems debate would have been worth it.



[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't realize they were invited. Knowing that, I am very surprised nobody showed up. Tancredo got good media coverage for being the only GOP candidate to attend the NAACP event.

If anybody had showed up, how would that have worked? Would they have been put on the stage with all the Democrats, or would they have had a separate event if a few Republicans had shown up?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-09-2007, 12:52 PM
NickMPK NickMPK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,626
Default Re: Thoughts on the Democratic Debate

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
According to a Tribune article, all of the GOP contenders were invited as well. I'm surprised none of the 2nd tier candidates showed up: the press from a GOP candidate crashing the Dems debate would have been worth it.



[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't realize they were invited. Knowing that, I am very surprised nobody showed up. Tancredo got good media coverage for being the only GOP candidate to attend the NAACP event.

If anybody had showed up, how would that have worked? Would they have been put on the stage with all the Democrats, or would they have had a separate event if a few Republicans had shown up?

[/ QUOTE ]

Although all the candidates were invited to the debate, in order to participate you had to fill out the questionnaire indicating that you were seeking the endorsement of the AFL-CIO.

All of the Democrats except Gravel, and none of the Republicans, completed the questionnaire.
I can understand why the Republicans didn't think it would be to their benefit to be seen as going after this endorsement.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.