Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-27-2007, 12:50 AM
chicheebee chicheebee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 51
Default variance and performance based evaluations

so a friend of mine works in sales, and is coming to the end of his probation period. whether he gets kept on is based solely on his "conversion rate", which is the proportion of calls he takes which result in actual sales, and is calculated at the end of each month - he needs 17.5% or higher to pass, and is currently on around 16%. now, from my poker background, i'm inclined to regard the number of calls he takes in a month as statistically insignificant (almost trivial). so i'm wondering a couple of things:

1. is it reasonable for them to select employees on this basis, or are they virtually picking people out of a hat?

2. if my friend doesn't get kept on because he just misses his target, is it worth kicking off on that basis, telling them they can't fire someone based on these results, cause they aren't worth [censored]. i have a degree in math, and my father is a professor of statistics, so if it came to that i'm confident we could "out math" them. but ultimately, we can't actually make them do anything, so it would just be a case of trying to embarrass them into changing their minds.worth a shot, or totally pointless?

cheers,
cheech
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-27-2007, 06:10 AM
pzhon pzhon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,515
Default Re: variance and performance based evaluations

[ QUOTE ]
is it reasonable for them to select employees on this basis, or are they virtually picking people out of a hat?

[/ QUOTE ]
It's not perfect, but it is a reasonable test. It might be that they should fire people who miss the target by a lot earlier, and let people who barely miss try longer, but that might actually be the policy. It could be that the real acceptable threshold is 25% conversions, and those who are between 17.5% and 25% are watched more closely later. Even if that is not the case, it's still better than random.

If you want to determine how much better than random it is, you need to describe both the number of calls and the amount of difference skill can make. Perfect informaition is not necessary, but are we talking about 40 calls during the probation period or 400? Is the difference between a good salesman and a bad one 25% vs. 15%, or is it 40% vs. 10%?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.