Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2007, 12:07 AM
Guruman Guruman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: still a NL fish - so lay off!
Posts: 3,704
Default standard pot control in position?

just started this session, but villain's short and hasnt reloaded so he may be a goob.

Poker Stars
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.10/$0.25
4 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
Guruman: $34.25
Button: $8.65
SB: $9.95
BB: $17.05

Pre-flop: (4 players) Guruman is UTG with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
<font color="#cc0000">Guruman raises to $0.75</font>, Button folds, SB calls, BB folds.

Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($1.75, 2 players)
SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Guruman bets $1.25</font>, SB calls.

Turn: J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($4.25, 2 players)
SB checks, Guruman checks.

River: 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($4.25, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">SB is all-in $7.95</font>, Guruman folds.
Uncalled bets: $7.95 returned to SB.

Results:
Final pot: $4.25

anything nonstandard?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2007, 12:12 AM
JuicyBones JuicyBones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 51
Default Re: standard pot control in position?

Seems very sensible to me..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-10-2007, 12:21 AM
BevillTheDevil BevillTheDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,342
Default Re: standard pot control in position?

standard. Obv split w/ most Kx hands but ppl love to slow play.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-10-2007, 08:24 AM
Guruman Guruman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: still a NL fish - so lay off!
Posts: 3,704
Default Re: standard pot control in position?

i asked if villain had anything, he claimed Q6 and I think i should be inclined to believe him.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-10-2007, 09:38 AM
Frosteater Frosteater is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 130
Default Re: standard pot control in position?

I'd play it the same. You're beating a bluff and that's about it. You might bet the turn to charge a flush draw, which is unlikely for villain to have, but you're already behind trips and the straight and just split with a weaker king, so I don't see much value in putting in any more money here.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-10-2007, 09:52 AM
Tevac Tevac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 36
Default Re: standard pot control in position?

On a side note (I am usually playing FR) - Is your hand a usual raising hand UTG with 4 players? And would you consider his proposed Q6 a reasonable calling hand in that situation (just curious)?

Any hints appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-10-2007, 10:53 AM
derosnec derosnec is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mmmmm chickfila
Posts: 6,159
Default Re: standard pot control in position?

fold K8s pf, with shorty on button and in blinds.

edit: also, leave the table, unless you are good at playing against shorties, which from your pf play indicates you are not (not to sound harsh).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-10-2007, 12:42 PM
Guruman Guruman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: still a NL fish - so lay off!
Posts: 3,704
Default Re: standard pot control in position?

dero,

i'd love to hear further thoughts on this. villain's short, but not so short that we're both showing down Qx and better without regard to any cards that fall.

given the "you're bad at playing agaist shorties" comment, I'd assume you found a glaring error postflop that I'd love to get filled in on. If the comment is based on the preflop play, then I disagree for now.

also, if I'm not good at playing shorties then I'll never get good at it by always leaving. This is the early part of my nl journey.

thx!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-10-2007, 12:50 PM
sww sww is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 184
Default Re: standard pot control in position?

No reason to bet the turn, he has never flushdraw since he called the flop unless its AsTs or Qsxs. Only AJ and JT could make it on the turn and call another bet.

On river you beat only a bluff and he cant get there with air since every possible draw somewhat hit on turn. So obviously an easy fold.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-10-2007, 12:51 PM
Perk76 Perk76 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 979
Default Re: standard pot control in position?

I think that raising Kx against shorties is not profitable in long run. Basically short stacks will play pots for their stack with basically any piece (especially TP) making it difficult to play Kx. You dont have alot of room to manuver with this hand against them. If there is a King on the flop, your married to it after they raise the CB with a super wide range of which alot of it will beat Kx. A shorties calling range is generally going to be better than Kx.

So preflop I dump this hand as well. Your better off doing it with 67 or some other connector that you can get away from when faced with resistance. This hand was dangerous enough that you didnt lose any more money with it.

I think once you get looked up on the flop in this hand, it looks standard checking turn, and folding river.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.