Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-07-2007, 11:37 PM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default 200 NL, I 3-barrel.

Villain is SobraoBoY, a decent 14/11 TAG playing like 54389729874932 tables at once.

He probably views me as LAGgy, but not spewish.

Poker Stars, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 8 Players
LeggoPoker Hand History Converter

SB: $143.90
BB: $161.75
UTG: $364.60
Hero (UTG+1): $200
MP1: $47.60
MP2: $127.95
CO: $63.75
BTN: $341.95

Pre-Flop: 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (UTG+1)
UTG folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $8</font>, 3 folds, BTN calls $8, 2 folds

Flop: ($19) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $14</font>, BTN calls $14

Turn: ($47) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $32</font>, BTN calls $32

River: ($111) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $70</font>

<font color="blue"> After his turn call his hand is pretty well defined as a mid-pair IMO. I think firing again is +EV against him as he's capable of laying down hands. I'm repping AA/KK/QQ/7x or any AQ/KQ that double-barreled turn and got there.</font>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2007, 11:48 PM
AllTheCheese AllTheCheese is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 508
Default Re: 200 NL, I 3-barrel.

IMO, he calls turn like 80%. So two barreling necessitates three-barreling. Betting turn and checking river would be the worst line imaginable. Should you have two-shelled in the first place? Idk, what's his FoldFlop? If he calls 66 on the flop, then yeah, add barrels. But if he has [99-QQ], I'm a little hesistant.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2007, 11:54 PM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: 200 NL, I 3-barrel.

[ QUOTE ]
Betting turn and checking river would be the worst line imaginable.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah I agree. It wouldn't make sense for me to bet the turn and give up on river.

[ QUOTE ]
Should you have two-shelled in the first place? Idk, what's his FoldFlop? If he calls 66 on the flop, then yeah, add barrels. But if he has [99-QQ], I'm a little hesistant.

[/ QUOTE ]
His cold-calling range preflop is a little wider than most TAGs, so I imagine he'd float the flop with weaker hands as well.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:01 AM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: 200 NL, I 3-barrel.

Fine vs. him. Minbet and hope he times out is also ok.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:01 AM
AllTheCheese AllTheCheese is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 508
Default Re: 200 NL, I 3-barrel.

Given what you said about Villain, I think 3-barrel is fine. I mean, you will show up here with hands very often, AA,KK,QQ,AQ,KQ, 55, and maybe JJ/TT (idk how you v-bet). I think your range includes significantly more actual hands than bluffs, so if he's thinking, he'll probably muck 88, 99, TT on this river.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:03 AM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: 200 NL, I 3-barrel.

[ QUOTE ]
Minbet and hope he times out is also ok.

[/ QUOTE ]
Hahahahaha QFT.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:04 AM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: 200 NL, I 3-barrel.

[ QUOTE ]
Given what you said about Villain, I think 3-barrel is fine. I mean, you will show up here with hands very often, AA,KK,QQ,AQ,KQ, 55, and maybe JJ/TT (idk how you v-bet). I think your range includes significantly more actual hands than bluffs, so if he's thinking, he'll probably muck 88, 99, TT on this river.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah I probably bet JJ too because he'll almost never have a better hand.

55 would be a bluff though. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:06 AM
AllTheCheese AllTheCheese is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 508
Default Re: 200 NL, I 3-barrel.

&lt;-- donkey

One time I stacked off like that. 88 on an A A 8 7 7 board.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:36 AM
Berge20 Berge20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Grinding Away
Posts: 4,989
Default Re: 200 NL, I 3-barrel.

What is your thought process on the size of the river bet?

I'm curious
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:39 AM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: 200 NL, I 3-barrel.

[ QUOTE ]
What is your thought process on the size of the river bet?

I'm curious

[/ QUOTE ]

I would think that its a believable vbet size, but also on the cheaper side of where you get away with it as a bluff.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.