Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:26 PM
Dan. Dan. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The European Phenom
Posts: 3,836
Default Re: Property Rights

I appriciate that these are much more coherent arguments than "natural rights." I tend to feel that property rights are a social construct, but Tom's position is pretty compelling.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:29 PM
Brainwalter Brainwalter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bragging about beats.
Posts: 4,336
Default Re: Property Rights

[ QUOTE ]
I appriciate that these are much more coherent arguments than "natural rights." I tend to feel that property rights are a social construct, but Tom's position is pretty compelling.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would consider my position a definition of a natural right. (OK maybe it's an example or illustration). At least this is what I mean when I say life, liberty, and property are natural rights.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:42 PM
moorobot moorobot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,038
Default Re: Property Rights

Tom's view is, as he has so far expressed it, the same as Robert Nozick's in his contemporary classic "Anarchy, State, Utopia". However, you shouldn't read Nozick without reading G.A. Cohen's "Self-ownership, Freedom, and Equality" which is generally thought to be a decisive refutation of Nozick's argument in two seperate ways (Cohen critiques Nozick's derivation of property rights from self-ownership, then argues against self-ownership itself).
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:44 PM
TomCollins TomCollins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Approving of Iron\'s Moderation
Posts: 7,517
Default Re: Property Rights

[ QUOTE ]
Tom's view is, as he has so far expressed it, the same as Robert Nozick's in his contemporary classic "Anarchy, State, Utopia". However, you shouldn't read Nozick without reading G.A. Cohen's "Self-ownership, Freedom, and Equality" which is generally thought to be a decisive refutation of Nozick's argument in two seperate ways (Cohen critiques Nozick's derivation of property rights from self-ownership, then argues against self-ownership itself).

[/ QUOTE ]

Sweet, someone who is an expert on my positions. From now on, if you have a question about my opinion, just ask moorobot, don't ask me!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:48 PM
moorobot moorobot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,038
Default Re: Property Rights

From how it has been explained so far it is identical to Nozick's...and I think everyone has had more than enough of your arrogance and petty smart-alec comments and insults, FYI.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-01-2006, 07:03 PM
TomCollins TomCollins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Approving of Iron\'s Moderation
Posts: 7,517
Default Re: Property Rights

[ QUOTE ]
From how it has been explained so far it is identical to Nozick's...and I think everyone has had more than enough of your arrogance and petty smart-alec comments and insults, FYI.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok Propertarian. Are you also dano?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.