|
|
#101
07-27-2007, 07:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Re-Randing
I've rerand, and I don't give a [censored] if some of you think it's not fair.
For the first turf wars, I ran 3, and I picked the one I thought would be the best game. For WoT, I reranded because a new player got a complex role. For Simpsons, I assigned a role to Madtown, because I had asked his advice on something, and it ended up being a secret plot. All of you getting all wah it wrecks the metagame need to pull your heads outta your asses. But I've been saying that for months, I doubt you'll listen to me now. For those of you that think it's unfair, it might be, but I think it makes a better game. 
|
|
#102
07-27-2007, 07:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-Randing
Zurvan is wrong.
Standard.
|
|
#104
07-27-2007, 07:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-Randing
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Zurvan and traz are wrong. Standard. But still wrong. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#106
07-27-2007, 07:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-Randing
[ QUOTE ]
I've rerand, and I don't give a [censored] if some of you think it's not fair. For the first turf wars, I ran 3, and I picked the one I thought would be the best game. For WoT, I reranded because a new player got a complex role. For Simpsons, I assigned a role to Madtown, because I had asked his advice on something, and it ended up being a secret plot. All of you getting all wah it wrecks the metagame need to pull your heads outta your asses. But I've been saying that for months, I doubt you'll listen to me now. For those of you that think it's unfair, it might be, but I think it makes a better game. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with you on all things metagame. But I think re-randing is a huge problem. Despite a myriad of other reasons, it could go as far as eventually lowering numbers of players because new players figure they can't be seer, etc.
|
|
#107
07-27-2007, 07:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-Randing
[ QUOTE ]
I've rerand, and I don't give a [censored] if some of you think it's not fair. For the first turf wars, I ran 3, and I picked the one I thought would be the best game. For WoT, I reranded because a new player got a complex role. For Simpsons, I assigned a role to Madtown, because I had asked his advice on something, and it ended up being a secret plot. All of you getting all wah it wrecks the metagame need to pull your heads outta your asses. But I've been saying that for months, I doubt you'll listen to me now. For those of you that think it's unfair, it might be, but I think it makes a better game. [/ QUOTE ] disgusting
|
|
#110
07-27-2007, 08:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-Randing
What if a handful of new players see a thread like this or see that it happens and decide not to play because they won't get a power role?
What about some of the older players that have had a cheapened experience because they got re-randed out of a role they would have really enjoyed. Re-randing should be looked down upon the same as talking at night, etc.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
