|
|
#22
01-20-2007, 01:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two pair 5/10
this is definitely a thick value bet
|
|
#23
01-20-2007, 01:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two pair 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
Can you explain how preflop is +EV? It may very well be, but I can't see why initially. [/ QUOTE ] it was probably played by one of the players mdma coaches who thinks they can outplay everyone postflop with position with any 2 (not saying mdma advises this, i doubt it in fact). i'd be very surprised if this hand was played by md. and btw i agree with u wpr, like i said in my other post. i dont like this call pf
|
|
#24
01-20-2007, 01:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two pair 5/10
Ok, thanks for the input everyone, I had a discussion with a very good player regarding this hand, and I was saying I couldn't imagine not betting here (I never even considered checking really), whereas he was not so convinced and we were both curious as to what the consensus was here.
And yeah, I didn't play this hand myself (surprise!), and neither would I have suggested any of my students to call with T2s preflop no [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#26
01-20-2007, 07:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two pair 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
bet and fold to a c/r [/ QUOTE ] If this is so obviously the "right" move, doesn't that make it "wrong" ?
|
|
#28
01-20-2007, 07:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two pair 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] checking is horrible here. [/ QUOTE ] You really think "horrible"? I admit it might be giving up some EV but I dont see that it'd be much if any. [/ QUOTE ] well "giving up EV" is inherently horrible.
|
|
#30
01-20-2007, 07:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two pair 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] bet and fold to a c/r [/ QUOTE ] If this is so obviously the "right" move, doesn't that make it "wrong" ? [/ QUOTE ] wtf are you saying? [/ QUOTE ] he assumes villain is on a higher level or something. i dunno. its retarded.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
