Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events

View Poll Results: Do you like the taste of cantaloupe
Yes 142 76.34%
No 44 23.66%
Voters: 186. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:11 PM
thatpfunk thatpfunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sandy eggo
Posts: 5,784
Default Re: Assani vs the StatHeads: Evaluating NFL QBs

[ QUOTE ]
49ers, Jaguars, and Dolphins are in the mix, too.

[/ QUOTE ]

dingo.
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:14 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Assani vs the StatHeads: Evaluating NFL QBs

Doug Gabriel has had a decent young career, not sure why he hasn't gotten any looks. Caldwell and Brown? I mean, they're not #1 options but they're average-ish.

They also had Ben Watson.

I mean, yesterday Peyton threw to a very good/great 1a type player and a bunch of people who combined for like 50 career receptions.
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:17 PM
Kneel B4 Zod Kneel B4 Zod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nobody roots for Goliath
Posts: 11,725
Default Re: Assani vs the StatHeads: Evaluating NFL QBs

[ QUOTE ]
I mean, yesterday Peyton threw to a very good/great 1a type player and a bunch of people who combined for like 50 career receptions.


[/ QUOTE ]

combined receptions this year for Gabriel/Gaffney/Caldwell/Brown/Jackson is probably <10, and it's all from Gaffney.

(2 of them are hurt, 3 are able bodied)

I find it hard to believe that Caldwell is average-ish if he can't manage to get on the field for the Redksins
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:20 PM
Vyse Vyse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: not tipping
Posts: 4,218
Default Re: Assani vs the StatHeads: Evaluating NFL QBs

i mean if the NFL was perfectly optimized and the depth chart followed skill level perfectly, everything you're saying would be 100% correct.

it's amazing how perfect the NFL is, isn't it?

no not really, just because someone isn't getting any time or whatever doesn't prove your point in and of itself, now stfu and get a new one.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:21 PM
thatpfunk thatpfunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sandy eggo
Posts: 5,784
Default Re: Assani vs the StatHeads: Evaluating NFL QBs

having troy brown, ben watson pretty much guarantees you cant be the worst.

i dont even get the point of this argument. obv tom brady is awesome and didn't have great weapons. and obv he can perform awesome with great weapons.

the difference between brady and manning is negligible, the argument is boring for non pats/colts fans; we'd love to have either guy on our team. rounding out spots 3, 4, 5 is so much more interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:24 PM
thatpfunk thatpfunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sandy eggo
Posts: 5,784
Default Re: Assani vs the StatHeads: Evaluating NFL QBs

"I find it hard to believe that Caldwell is average-ish if he can't manage to get on the field for the Redksins "

you have to remember how sign-happy the skins went with wr:
moss, randle-el, thrash, mccardell, lloyd. they cut patten.
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:27 PM
Kneel B4 Zod Kneel B4 Zod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nobody roots for Goliath
Posts: 11,725
Default Re: Assani vs the StatHeads: Evaluating NFL QBs

[ QUOTE ]
having troy brown, ben watson pretty much guarantees you cant be the worst.

i dont even get the point of this argument. obv tom brady is awesome and didn't have great weapons. and obv he can perform awesome with great weapons.

the difference between brady and manning is negligible, the argument is boring for non pats/colts fans; we'd love to have either guy on our team.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok, apologies. but to this point:

[ QUOTE ]
rounding out spots 3, 4, 5 is so much more interesting.

[/ QUOTE ]

if you go back a year and look at threads here, the consensus for QB ratings was basically

Peyton







Brady/Brees/Palmer/Rivers, in no particular order.

in hindsight pointing out the lack of WR talent is ldo, but go back to last year and lots of people couldn't see it. it's kind of funny to see the change.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:28 PM
MuresanForMVP MuresanForMVP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: out there
Posts: 2,706
Default Re: Assani vs the StatHeads: Evaluating NFL QBs

[ QUOTE ]
juan dixon yo mouth is more like it

[/ QUOTE ]


Fyp
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:30 PM
SL__72 SL__72 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The gun show.
Posts: 4,023
Default Re: Assani vs the StatHeads: Evaluating NFL QBs

I always thought it was:
Peyton

Brady


Palmer/Brees/etc.

If that isn't the case, why has this same argument been going on for the past 5 years?
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:33 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Assani vs the StatHeads: Evaluating NFL QBs

It has been...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.