Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Sports Betting
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-30-2007, 12:43 AM
TomCowley TomCowley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 354
Default Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4

If you have the option of RRing 3-teamers at +180 and 2-teamers @-110, it's better to do just the 3-teamers. The opposite is true for 2-teamers @+100.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-30-2007, 01:59 AM
greg44 greg44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 362
Default Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4

I'd consider Atlanta and New York to your collection. Definitely sharp money on these picks. I also added Detroit cuz they're 2.5 at pinnacle.

Actually, I thinkt they're all at 2.5 now. Like I said above the sharp money is on all these sides.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-30-2007, 02:36 AM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wongs are two things, (at least).
Posts: 10,376
Default Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4

[ QUOTE ]
So are you doing 2-teamers, 3-team round-robin and 4-team round-robins?

[/ QUOTE ]

RR'ing, just 2 teamers. My guy doesn't do 3 teamers for 6 point teases.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-30-2007, 02:38 AM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wongs are two things, (at least).
Posts: 10,376
Default Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4

[ QUOTE ]
I'd consider Atlanta and New York to your collection. Definitely sharp money on these picks. I also added Detroit cuz they're 2.5 at pinnacle.

Actually, I thinkt they're all at 2.5 now. Like I said above the sharp money is on all these sides.

[/ QUOTE ]
I like ATL better than NYG, and may add that in too. Will let you guys know.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-30-2007, 03:07 AM
fleece_me fleece_me is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 293
Default Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4

The Giants clearly qualify. Not sure why they aren't included other than they suck
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-30-2007, 07:09 AM
MrG MrG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mass,
Posts: 210
Default Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4

Are these prices good.
5 teamer 100 pays 450
4 teamers 100 pays 280

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-30-2007, 10:02 AM
thing85 thing85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 100NL but I like uNL too much to leave
Posts: 3,672
Default Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4

[ QUOTE ]
Are these prices good.
5 teamer 100 pays 450
4 teamers 100 pays 280

Thanks

[/ QUOTE ]

Your 4 teamer is only paying +280 but I believe +300 is widely available.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-30-2007, 11:27 AM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wongs are two things, (at least).
Posts: 10,376
Default Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4

[ QUOTE ]
The Giants clearly qualify. Not sure why they aren't included other than they suck

[/ QUOTE ]
No, they don't I have them at +3, and many other books do too.

I tease ALL true Wongs via my books line for this trial.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-30-2007, 12:08 PM
hogua hogua is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 659
Default Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The Giants clearly qualify. Not sure why they aren't included other than they suck

[/ QUOTE ]
No, they don't I have them at +3, and many other books do too.

I tease ALL true Wongs via my books line for this trial.

[/ QUOTE ]

If the market (i.e vast majority of books, including the sharp books) have the Giants at +2.5. Why not teast then at you book and get a half a point on the tease for free?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-30-2007, 12:13 PM
Thremp Thremp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Free Kyleb
Posts: 10,163
Default Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4

I have:

Atlanta
Detroit
49ers
Giants
Patriots

Vikings have moved out of the realm (obv if your book can get your through the 7 thats fine and gains a small amount of expectation from a bad line)

I fully expect Vikings to cover and Giants to not since that is what happens despite Daliman's accusations.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.