3-betting ranges - Page 3

mc123 · #21 02-23-2006, 06:47 PM

given the description of the players don't you think there is value for 3betting these hands bk?

obviously this wouldn't be a standard line to take but given the opportunity I think I would 3bet here lots with good multiway hands.

Paluka · #22 02-23-2006, 06:58 PM

[ QUOTE ]
given the description of the players don't you think there is value for 3betting these hands bk?

obviously this wouldn't be a standard line to take but given the opportunity I think I would 3bet here lots with good multiway hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think 3 betting a hand like 78s would be a very bad mistake. I'd much much rather fold than 3 bet.

DeathDonkey · #23 02-23-2006, 10:46 PM

Good stuff to think about. 3 bet KJo? You are a LAG [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

-DeathDonkey

mikelow · #24 02-23-2006, 11:14 PM

three bet with pocket pairs 88 and up, any AK or AQ, AJ and probably ATs, KJs, KQs (fold KQo half the time, three bet with it half the time), and even QJs and sometime with JTs.

You want the TAG out of the pot.

mikelow · #25 02-23-2006, 11:17 PM

That's odd. I hate ATo against these kind of players. Gotta be soooted....

And I think this is almost a threebet or fold situation.

coolandtough · #26 02-24-2006, 12:27 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Raise: 99+, AJo+, ATs+, KQs.
Coldcall a bunch of others.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]

This looks like pretty good advice.

[/ QUOTE ]

99 is a hand i kinda have a problem 3betting here. 3 opponents is a bad number for 99, especially against super loose guys whose ranges include random overs. In that game, I think I'd rather get a couple more callers in preflop.

KaneKungFu123 · #27 02-24-2006, 10:43 AM

Entity,

I would raise all suited connecters, pairs, Ace suited.

These are good "multi player hands". you should build the pots with these.

I also raise all the usual suspects.

A9o might be a 3 bet. Probably half the time.

mc123 · #28 02-24-2006, 12:01 PM

[ QUOTE ]

I think 3 betting a hand like 78s would be a very bad mistake. I'd much much rather fold than 3 bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would you consider 89s and 9Ts to be 3betting hands then? Because given the description of the players if your going to 3bet 89s you might as well 3bet 78s too.

Paluka · #29 02-24-2006, 12:15 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I think 3 betting a hand like 78s would be a very bad mistake. I'd much much rather fold than 3 bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would you consider 89s and 9Ts to be 3betting hands then? Because given the description of the players if your going to 3bet 89s you might as well 3bet 78s too.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would not 3 bet with any of those hands. Just like I would not 3 bet with 55, but I would certainly cold call.

PokerBot123 · #30 02-24-2006, 12:26 PM

I think you could call with Axs because you want the button and the blinds to call with their lower suited hands that u may get into very big trouble. Also this would make it a lot easier to get away from a poor ace.

Playing KJos is probably going to far, it's not easy to play that hand against "crazy" people [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. With or without position.