Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-12-2007, 05:13 PM
fitnessfreak fitnessfreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: shedding the kilos
Posts: 1,376
Default Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?

value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-12-2007, 05:14 PM
luvetoholdem luvetoholdem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 161
Default Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?

[ QUOTE ]
value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]


I think 200 would do the trick
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-12-2007, 05:17 PM
fitnessfreak fitnessfreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: shedding the kilos
Posts: 1,376
Default Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]


I think 200 would do the trick

[/ QUOTE ]

what trick is that? the trick im trying is to get all his money by overbet shoving a marginal hand for value. a 200 bet simply will not accomplish this [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

of course i like 200-250 more as he is much more likely to call with worse. but meh, i was thinking itd be a cool hand to post in the MSNL thread if he got called by T9 or something. and i did say it was more for fun than anything.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-12-2007, 05:26 PM
Mossberg Mossberg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,824
Default Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?

[ QUOTE ]
This is not thin, this is standard......not betting here vs this guy is criminal.

[/ QUOTE ]


I thought so too. I showed this hand to a couple 2+2er friends over MSN, and both of them were doubting the value of a bet.

I agree with everyone that I should have made it a little bigger!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-12-2007, 07:21 PM
fslexcduck fslexcduck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 4,531
Default Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?

AK didn't get there. so shove!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-12-2007, 10:49 PM
AAismyfriend AAismyfriend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Valuestacking myself
Posts: 2,907
Default Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?

[ QUOTE ]
value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

sick fun indeed! I still think 200ish is more profitable since he folds a lot more to a shove, but the few times that he calls and mucks to a shove here makes shoving awesome in a feeding your ego kind of way.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-12-2007, 10:55 PM
MatthewRyan MatthewRyan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,831
Default Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?

shove
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.