scotty win ME bustout hand

runhot · #1 10-09-2007, 02:20 PM

i had espn on last night in the background and half way heard the hand scotty busted out on..

he was in BB with AQ vs SB w/ 55.

flop comes Q5x , sb checks, scotty bet, sb call.

turn K, sb checks and scotty goes allin???? wtf. can someone maybe fill me in on stack sizes or do i have the hand wrong?

why would he turn his hand into a bluff here?

hrududu · #2 10-09-2007, 03:05 PM

Did he nguyen the hand?

BlueArchon · #3 10-09-2007, 03:15 PM

you call it's all over baby!

The B · #4 10-09-2007, 03:20 PM

Fill-up Hilm

gusmahler · #5 10-09-2007, 03:29 PM

That wasn't the bustout hand. It's the hand that crippled Scotty (he had about 3M after the hand).

You can see the hand on Pokertube (won't do a direct link, not sure if that's allowed here.)

Blinds were 80/160
Scotty (SB) has AQo and bets 530k. Has about 11M behind.
Hilm (BB with 55) calls

Pot T1,160,000
Flop: Q56 rainbow
Scotty bets 600k
Hilm calls

Pot: 2,360,000
Turn is a K
Scotty checks
Hilm bets 1,200,000
Scotty check-raises all-in
Hilm calls and wins.

Pot 16,060,000
Hilm wins.

Here's the bustout hand:

Blinds 80/160
Hilm (UTG) has KQo and bets 480k
Scotty (BB) has Tc9c and calls

Pot 1,140,000
Flop: 3K7 (two clubs)
Scotty pushes (2.28M)
Hilm calls

No clubs for Scotty and Hilm wins the 5.7M pot.

UATrewqaz · #6 10-09-2007, 04:01 PM

It was a horribly -EV play, that's really all you can say about it.

runhot · #7 10-09-2007, 09:05 PM

a check raise all in with second pair tk, to turn your hand into a bluff... i dunno.. maybe i'm not thinking on the right level.. is there something i'm missing?

A_C_Slater · #8 10-09-2007, 10:30 PM

[ QUOTE ]
a check raise all in with second pair tk, to turn your hand into a bluff... i dunno.. maybe i'm not thinking on the right level.. is there something i'm missing?

[/ QUOTE ]

No worse hand calls and no better hand folds. Even if Hilm was playing him super aggro this still applies. He should have simply check/called turn as his hand is only a bluff inducer/thin value bet catcher at that point.

runhot · #9 10-09-2007, 11:05 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
a check raise all in with second pair tk, to turn your hand into a bluff... i dunno.. maybe i'm not thinking on the right level.. is there something i'm missing?

[/ QUOTE ]

thats what i said

No worse hand calls and no better hand folds. Even if Hilm was playing him super aggro this still applies. He should have simply check/called turn as his hand is only a bluff inducer/thin value bet catcher at that point.

[/ QUOTE ]

runhot · #10 10-09-2007, 11:06 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
a check raise all in with second pair tk, to turn your hand into a bluff... i dunno.. maybe i'm not thinking on the right level.. is there something i'm missing?

[/ QUOTE ]

No worse hand calls and no better hand folds. Even if Hilm was playing him super aggro this still applies. He should have simply check/called turn as his hand is only a bluff inducer/thin value bet catcher at that point.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

thats what i said