Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2007, 05:33 AM
Dire Dire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,511
Default Are the current sites against poker \'legalization\' in the US?

So I was reading this thread about how Barry G predicts online poker [in the states] will likely be 'legalized' within 6 months, and how the PPA has been putting forth a great effort to further such legalization, so fourth and so on.

What's always seemed odd to me about this whole regulation issue is that there's never really been any major/visible lobbying from the current sites to regulate and legalize poker in the states, in spite of the fact that the US makes up a huge chunk of all online poker players. They did effectively nothing prior to the UIGEA as well.

And then I realized something. If poker is legalized, it could spell the end for these sites. Everybody's talking about how incredible it would be to have access to Party again, but poker.bellagio.com / MGMpoker.com / etc will make Party look like a rock garden. The names and security alone will bring countless fresh schools to the new name sites, which will also take the high volume regulars away from Stars/Tilt/Party/etc and onto the 'new' sites.

Are the current sites against regulation? Do you think they were against any sort of regulation prior to the UIGEA and may have even been indirectly in favor of the UIGEA? I mean it has been quite predictably ineffective at preventing people who want to play online from doing so, but at the same time it's been extremely effective at ensuring no new major competition for US players springs up. This seems so tin foil hattish, but it sure makes alot of sense right now.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-28-2007, 07:14 AM
hazillow hazillow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 72
Default Re: Are the current sites against poker \'legalization\' in the US?

i think they would rather have competition than the threat that they could be shut down and have all their funds seized at any moment.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-28-2007, 03:10 PM
whangarei whangarei is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: I :heart: Stars
Posts: 857
Default Re: Are the current sites against poker \'legalization\' in the US?

[ QUOTE ]
... and how the PPA has been putting forth a great effort to further such legalization ...

[/ QUOTE ]

Most (or at least a sizeable chunk) of the PPA membership comes from the Stars/FTP PPA freerols. I also think that FTP offered a $100 bonus for a $100 donation to the PPA.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-28-2007, 04:54 PM
Dire Dire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,511
Default Re: Are the current sites against poker \'legalization\' in the US?

[ QUOTE ]
i think they would rather have competition than the threat that they could be shut down and have all their funds seized at any moment.

[/ QUOTE ]

What do you mean? As long as the sites and their operators stay out of the US and don't maintain any US assets, they can't be touched.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2007, 04:57 PM
Dire Dire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,511
Default Re: Are the current sites against poker \'legalization\' in the US?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
... and how the PPA has been putting forth a great effort to further such legalization ...

[/ QUOTE ]

Most (or at least a sizeable chunk) of the PPA membership comes from the Stars/FTP PPA freerols. I also think that FTP offered a $100 bonus for a $100 donation to the PPA.

[/ QUOTE ]

But again, those are extremely passive forms of support. The $100 bonus from FTP doesn't cost them anything even. In fact, in a way it's even free advertising for their site. The same could be said for the freerolls. These sites are making many millions per year from US players but again just sit/sat largely idle in face of all the US legislation.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2007, 05:06 PM
londomollari londomollari is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 419
Default Re: Are the current sites against poker \'legalization\' in the US?

Aren't Lederer/Ferguson etc part owners of full tilt? And Greenstein is sponsored by pokerstars.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-28-2007, 07:22 PM
Mr Sarcastic Mr Sarcastic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 50
Default Re: Are the current sites against poker \'legalization\' in the US?

"Barry G predicts online poker [in the states] will likely be 'legalized' within 6 months"

If Barry G said that, then he is worse at political analysis than I am at poker. No f'ing way is "online poker "legalized" within 6 months" ...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-28-2007, 09:39 PM
whangarei whangarei is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: I :heart: Stars
Posts: 857
Default Re: Are the current sites against poker \'legalization\' in the US?

As foreign entities Stars/FT are significantly limited by law in the type of lobbying access they have to the US government.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-29-2007, 01:39 PM
Berge20 Berge20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Grinding Away
Posts: 4,989
Default Re: Are the current sites against poker \'legalization\' in the US?

[ QUOTE ]
"Barry G predicts online poker [in the states] will likely be 'legalized' within 6 months"

If Barry G said that, then he is worse at political analysis than I am at poker. No f'ing way is "online poker "legalized" within 6 months" ...

[/ QUOTE ]

Discussion in Legislation Forum about this timeline
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-29-2007, 02:19 PM
Backspin20 Backspin20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of Boomswich, NJ
Posts: 845
Default Re: Are the current sites against poker \'legalization\' in the US?

[ QUOTE ]
"Barry G predicts online poker [in the states] will likely be 'legalized' within 6 months"

If Barry G said that, then he is worse at political analysis than I am at poker. No f'ing way is "online poker "legalized" within 6 months" ...

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree, this is still pretty far off.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.