Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes

View Poll Results: RB
W. Parker 11 52.38%
R. Brown 4 19.05%
B. Jacobs 6 28.57%
C. Buckhalter 0 0%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:00 PM
thac thac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Go Buckeyes imo
Posts: 9,941
Default Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts

Bump to see if villain showed up with 44
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:05 PM
ikestoys ikestoys is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: I\'m not folding, stop bluffing
Posts: 5,642
Default Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts

tbh nielso, i can't think of a person on this entire forum more intellectually dishonest than you.

just stating what your image is here
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:11 PM
nazahl nazahl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: gee
Posts: 1,042
Default Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts

[ QUOTE ]
tbh nielso, i can't think of a person on this entire forum more intellectually dishonest than you.

just stating what your image is here

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:14 PM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sverige
Posts: 6,815
Default Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts

Whoa.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:16 PM
ikestoys ikestoys is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: I\'m not folding, stop bluffing
Posts: 5,642
Default Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts

From every post being about how you played it a hand in a non std way (yet brilliantly) to using your blog as a cite in politics forum... i just can't think of anyone else who pulls this kind of crap week in week out
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:27 PM
tubasteve tubasteve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 3-bet
Posts: 7,271
Default Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts

um, raise somewhere. this is so so gross. how could you ever think just calling the river would be ok? this guy raised UTG then fired 3 streets, his range includes all kinds of stuff you beat that isn't folding.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:31 PM
Paul Thomson Paul Thomson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: donking it up NL200
Posts: 3,589
Default Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts

[ QUOTE ]
euh super easy shove why can't he valuebet worse? he's never folding a made hand when he gets like 90:300


Board: Tc 2h 9d Qc 4h
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 46.429% 46.43% 00.00% 13 0.00 { QQ+, TT-99, AQs, KJs }
Hand 1: 53.571% 53.57% 00.00% 15 0.00 { 2c2s }

AQs = discounting AQ by a lot
and this is pretty much the absolute worst case scenario for us
KJs has to be discounted bc of preflop (and he might have QTs too if he plays KJs) and sets have to be discounted because imho he valuebets them harder

[/ QUOTE ]

kaby - u want to be ahead of his CALLING RANGE more than 50%
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:35 PM
ikestoys ikestoys is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: I\'m not folding, stop bluffing
Posts: 5,642
Default Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
euh super easy shove why can't he valuebet worse? he's never folding a made hand when he gets like 90:300


Board: Tc 2h 9d Qc 4h
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 46.429% 46.43% 00.00% 13 0.00 { QQ+, TT-99, AQs, KJs }
Hand 1: 53.571% 53.57% 00.00% 15 0.00 { 2c2s }

AQs = discounting AQ by a lot
and this is pretty much the absolute worst case scenario for us
KJs has to be discounted bc of preflop (and he might have QTs too if he plays KJs) and sets have to be discounted because imho he valuebets them harder

[/ QUOTE ]

kaby - u want to be ahead of his CALLING RANGE more than 50%

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
everything that bets the river that isn't a complete bluff is calling a shove wth

he will get 90:500 odds ..................

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:41 PM
AZDezertRat AZDezertRat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yea im a showdown monkey
Posts: 55
Default Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts

Shove the river... with that pot hes calling with a lot that you beat

Uncle R is one of the better players but will call to light on the river
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:51 PM
Imrahil Imrahil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 7,500
Default Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts

Bottom set is better than top set so SHOVE RIVER
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.