|
|
#12
10-23-2007, 12:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl10: baluga theorem?
[ QUOTE ]
seriously - if you've been raising the last couple of hands pf, this is a great hand to pick up so you can actually raise a legitimate hand [/ QUOTE ] These are great points, you should be looking for action in a raised pot with a hand like AK rather than avoiding it. My comments illustrate the weak/nit in me...I'm working on it though! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] 
|
|
#13
10-23-2007, 12:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nl10: baluga theorem?
To jump on the bandwagon here, your eyes should light up when you see a premium hand after raising x number of times in a row. Youre so much more likely to get action (which is a good thing), but you negated that by just limping. Next time, raise it up, if someone 3-bets you, you can 4 bet or shove and laugh at what they call you with.
|
|
#14
10-23-2007, 12:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nl10: baluga theorem?
i ground out my roll playing sngs, where its totally standard to limp ak UTG. I need to learn to not be such a tagfish/nit and start learning to play raised pots out of position.
|
|
#15
10-23-2007, 12:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nl10: baluga theorem?
Yup
|
|
#16
10-23-2007, 01:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nl10: baluga theorem?
[ QUOTE ]
i ground out my roll playing sngs, where its totally standard to limp ak UTG. I need to learn to not be such a tagfish/nit and start learning to play raised pots out of position. [/ QUOTE ] I raise it UTG in a STT whatever buy-in as well. Wouldn't say it's a standart limp -
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
