FR and 6 max

[Flip-Flop]

Those that play on FTP play mostly 6-max not by choice but because that`s what`s most available.

On PS you have much more tables to choose from.
FR there seems infested with multi-tabing regulars (usually 3-5 per table) and the games are pretty tight while 6-max PLO is ultra loose fest, at least thats my experience.

I don`t know how many 2+2ers play there because I never bothered to find out, I only play occasionally online and so far for PLO FTP suits me the best.

[abscr]

I used to play FR exclusively, but as others have said, 6-max is much more available, and one has to go where the action is. I was hesitant to, just because [generally] when fish play too many hands, it isn't as big of a mistake as it is when it's FR. But, I've found that it is made up for because you get more hands in, so you have many more chances to outplay them postflop.

[sc000t]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
HU>SH>6max>FR

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Well ya...

[Wires]

Thanks for the info guys. Looks like my thoughts were confirmed with the distribution between 6max/HU/FR being similar to NLHE.

I'll stick with 6max then - just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing out on something [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]


Buzz - thanks for setting up the poll.

[Troll_Inc]

[ QUOTE ]
I prefer and am better at full ring.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd rather take a nap than play full ring.