Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > Tournament Circuit/WSOP
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-28-2006, 02:20 PM
bgoalie35 bgoalie35 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: nitting it up
Posts: 617
Default Re: Cardplayer coverage sucks

NH sir. Now can we sticky the Raymer hand to the top of every forum so everyone will stop posting about it.

Live updates are fine, although I would like to see the chip count for everyone, not just "friends of Full Tilt poker".
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-28-2006, 02:31 PM
mlagoo mlagoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: confused
Posts: 12,644
Default Re: Cardplayer coverage sucks

[ QUOTE ]
NH sir. Now can we sticky the Raymer hand to the top of every forum so everyone will stop posting about it.

[/ QUOTE ]

speaking of the raymer hand, did anyone notice the cardplayer update when they said his QQ lost to AK on an AKJTx board?

wouldn't his straight have beaten his opponent's two pair?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-28-2006, 02:35 PM
idrinkcoors idrinkcoors is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 668
Default Re: Cardplayer coverage sucks

I'm not saying that Full Tilt is taking over the coverage at Cardplayer.com, but this hand description was strange:

"Carlos Mortenson, a member of Full Tilt Poker, just increased his Full Tilt Leaderboard chip lead to 34,566 by beating out non Full Tilt player Tom Reynolds. Mortenson, who likes to sharpen his skills by playing on Full Tilt poker, flopped a flush to take the tournament lead over 92 other players, many, many of whom like to play on Full Tilt poker. Thus far, 2,145 players, (none of whom play for Full Tilt poker), have busted out of the tournament.

You can play with Carlos Mortenson and many other successful pros at Full Tilt poker."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-28-2006, 02:36 PM
TroutMaskReplica TroutMaskReplica is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: back to school
Posts: 315
Default Re: Cardplayer coverage sucks

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
NH sir. Now can we sticky the Raymer hand to the top of every forum so everyone will stop posting about it.

[/ QUOTE ]

speaking of the raymer hand, did anyone notice the cardplayer update when they said his QQ lost to AK on an AKJTx board?

wouldn't his straight have beaten his opponent's two pair?

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, i saw that, WTF??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-28-2006, 02:57 PM
mlagoo mlagoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: confused
Posts: 12,644
Default Re: Cardplayer coverage sucks

[ QUOTE ]
"Carlos Mortenson, a member of Full Tilt Poker, just increased his Full Tilt Leaderboard chip lead to 34,566 by beating out non Full Tilt player Tom Reynolds. Mortenson, who likes to sharpen his skills by playing on Full Tilt poker, flopped a flush to take the tournament lead over 92 other players, many, many of whom like to play on Full Tilt poker. Thus far, 2,145 players, (none of whom play for Full Tilt poker), have busted out of the tournament.

You can play with Carlos Mortenson and many other successful pros at Full Tilt poker."

[/ QUOTE ]

HAHAHAHAHA

oh wow i missed that.

that's hilarious.

edit: btw if this was made up i'm gonna be real disappointed.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-28-2006, 02:58 PM
Nez477 Nez477 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Crushing on tROY
Posts: 7,216
Default Re: Cardplayer coverage sucks

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
NH sir. Now can we sticky the Raymer hand to the top of every forum so everyone will stop posting about it.

[/ QUOTE ]

speaking of the raymer hand, did anyone notice the cardplayer update when they said his QQ lost to AK on an AKJTx board?

wouldn't his straight have beaten his opponent's two pair?

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, i saw that, WTF??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

The J obviously stands for joker. His opponent had Aces full.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-28-2006, 03:27 PM
faded faded is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: who dey
Posts: 1,610
Default Re: Cardplayer coverage sucks

TTF,
Beautiful avatar.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-28-2006, 05:01 PM
Austiger Austiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,504
Default Re: Cardplayer coverage sucks

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one that see the QQ making a river straight vs. Raymers top two pair?

[/ QUOTE ]

No - all the people who posted above you saw this, which was why this thread was started.

[/ QUOTE ]

Am I the only one who noticed that Tothefelt thought that Raymer was the one with AK, and that dlk9s thought that Tothefelt thought he was the first one to notice that Raymer should have won the hand with the straight, when actually Tothefelt thought that Raymer was the one with AK and he should have been making fun of him for that mistake instead of the one that he thought he made?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-28-2006, 05:52 PM
dlk9s dlk9s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: It\'s not gonna happen.
Posts: 3,410
Default Re: Cardplayer coverage sucks

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one that see the QQ making a river straight vs. Raymers top two pair?

[/ QUOTE ]

No - all the people who posted above you saw this, which was why this thread was started.

[/ QUOTE ]

Am I the only one who noticed that Tothefelt thought that Raymer was the one with AK, and that dlk9s thought that Tothefelt thought he was the first one to notice that Raymer should have won the hand with the straight, when actually Tothefelt thought that Raymer was the one with AK and he should have been making fun of him for that mistake instead of the one that he thought he made?

[/ QUOTE ]

Touche. Well played.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-28-2006, 07:42 PM
duma duma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: du ma con cac
Posts: 524
Default Re: Cardplayer coverage sucks

i think card player redisnged their site for the worst. their new format just slows things down. it was much easier to navigate before. they are trying too hard to improve and it ends up being worse.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.