Daliman's Wong Teasers, Season Deux: Week 9

[n2p]

At what juice is it good to add a +3 team?

[Chickenfly69]

Got GB +8.5, Sea +8, Buffalo +7.5, San Diego -1.5, and Hou +9

[Daliman]

[ QUOTE ]
Buffalo is +1.5 at Bodog too. The SD true line is actually -7, so I'm curious of that pick considering they are also a road fave.

Wouldn't one of the +3 big juice games(Denver,Houston) be a better choice here?

[/ QUOTE ]


I missed the Buffalo game somehow, but Den and Hou are away teams, so passing. I'm guessing it was a sharp lines thing, as I'm pretty sure I have them. Adding in buffalo, and GB is apparently +2.5 now, but SD down to 7, grrrr. Gonna keep them in the wongs anyways for congruity, although it makes me feel a bit dirty.

My 4 teamer will be for $200.

[chaz64]

Did GB/Sea at Bodog last night, Buf was +1 at the time [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] so left them out.

GL all.

[Daliman]

[ QUOTE ]
Hey, do you guys still wong even when you think a line is way off?

Example this weekend: Clev -1.5 I think is pretty far off. I figure them to be a 3 to 3.5 point fav over the Hawks (and have bet that appropriately).

Wong would say bet Sea +7.5 here. But obv if I think the line should be Sea +3 the game doesn't have wong value (especially since the line would only move +4.5 from my "fair value", not +6).

So in this situation would you normally continue to wong Sea +7.5, or would you lay off?

- C -

[/ QUOTE ]

That's up to you, but to me, a wong is a wong. Obv it is far more likely you are wrong than they are.

[kordoISback]

(419) San Diego Chargers -1½ Sun@1:00p
Competitor: (420) Minnesota Vikings


does that mean that changers need to win by 2 points or more? and i win?

[bills217]

[ QUOTE ]
(419) San Diego Chargers -1½ Sun@1:00p
Competitor: (420) Minnesota Vikings


does that mean that changers need to win by 2 points or more? and i win?

[/ QUOTE ]

yep

[siccjay]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hey, do you guys still wong even when you think a line is way off?

Example this weekend: Clev -1.5 I think is pretty far off. I figure them to be a 3 to 3.5 point fav over the Hawks (and have bet that appropriately).

Wong would say bet Sea +7.5 here. But obv if I think the line should be Sea +3 the game doesn't have wong value (especially since the line would only move +4.5 from my "fair value", not +6).

So in this situation would you normally continue to wong Sea +7.5, or would you lay off?

- C -

[/ QUOTE ]

That's up to you, but to me, a wong is a wong. Obv it is far more likely you are wrong than they are.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is troof! I was a little worried about some of the games two weeks ago, but just bit the bullet and did it and it turned out very nice.

[Sdrive]

where is LT today? where is antonio gates? where is the D?

[siccjay]

I don't know, but we sure shouldn't have added SD anyway. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]